Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Two more Cirrus planes crashed this week

  1. #1
    Senior Member hiss srq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Around here and near there.
    Posts
    5,565

    Two more Cirrus planes crashed this week

    So Friday a SR22 went down and now today another one went down in known icing condition over Arizona. Any thoughts?
    Southwest Airlines-"Once it pop's it's time to stop" Southwest Airlines-"Our Shamu's are almost real" Southwest Airlines -"We blow our top real easy" Southwest Airlines- "You can't top us..... really"

  2. #2
    Moderator Matt Molnar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    9,302
    GA planes crash pretty frequently, don't they?
    Ladies and gentlemen, this is your captain speaking. We have a small problem.
    All four engines have stopped. We are doing our damnedest to get them under control.
    I trust you are not in too much distress. —Captain Eric Moody, British Airways Flight 9

  3. #3
    Senior Member hiss srq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Around here and near there.
    Posts
    5,565
    yes I think some of it has to do with the inexperince of some GA pilots and I think in the Cirrus case it is a mix of things. I think that the Cirrus is too complex for the average pilot really. I question if I would feel confindent really flying that plane personally
    Southwest Airlines-"Once it pop's it's time to stop" Southwest Airlines-"Our Shamu's are almost real" Southwest Airlines -"We blow our top real easy" Southwest Airlines- "You can't top us..... really"

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    PTW R-090 12.9 DME/ ARD R-275 17.0 DME
    Posts
    351
    The Cirrus is just an all around bad aircraft in even the lightest icing conditions.

  5. #5
    Moderator mirrodie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Me like the Robert Downey Jr of cooooooookies!
    Posts
    5,749
    The Cirrus's main draw seems ot be its parachute system.

    BUt since all the other aspects are not great, I'm waiting for when Cessna finally can adopt a similar mechanism. Take a proven aircraft of good reliability and enhance its safety.
    And I, I took the path less traveled by
    and that has made all the difference......yet...
    I have a feeling a handle of people are going to be very interested in what I post in the near future.

    http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=187

  6. #6
    Senior Member RDU-JFK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    1,185
    Cessnas don't need a parachute like the Cirrus because Cessnas don't have that nasty habit of spinning.
    "I can't wait until tomorrow, cause I get better looking everyday"
    --Joe Namath

  7. #7
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Islip, Long Island
    Posts
    43
    i think it's the sidestick (besides the icing condition crash..) because i have flown in a cirrus a few times...and it's just not natural....i think it takes adjusting to it...i feel more comfortable with the controls in front of me so if you need to you can grab it quickly...and with both hands...i don't like the sidestick. you don't see them in cars now...so why in an airplane?
    Why does Boeing start with a "B"? Because it's Better than Airbus.

  8. #8
    Senior Member moose135's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    8,067
    Quote Originally Posted by JennyPie
    i think it's the sidestick (besides the icing condition crash..) because i have flown in a cirrus a few times...and it's just not natural....i think it takes adjusting to it...i feel more comfortable with the controls in front of me so if you need to you can grab it quickly...and with both hands...i don't like the sidestick. you don't see them in cars now...so why in an airplane?
    It's just something that takes a little getting used to. Airbus has been using a sidestick in the A320, A330, A340 and now the A380, and of course the F-16 has used one for nearly 30 years. Not much different from going between aircraft using a control wheel and a stick, or moving from the left to right seat and switching hands on the controls.

    And I would try to avoid grabbing the controls quickly with both hands (well, unless the ground was approaching rapidly) - better to use smooth, steady control inputs.

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Islip, Long Island
    Posts
    43
    don't worry babe....i didn't mean i would hold the controls with both hands while cruising :P
    it's just a comfort thing for me knowing if i had to, i could put both hands on if the situation called for it, can't do that with a sidestick...therefore, i'm more comfortable with the controls :)
    thats all!
    Why does Boeing start with a "B"? Because it's Better than Airbus.

  10. #10
    Senior Member HPNPilot1200's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    222
    The main issue I find in Cirrus aircraft is the fact that it is almost too easy to fly in that there is no thought to double check or stay ahead of the airplane for whatever may lie ahead. The aircraft uses that major flaw as its principle advertising technique which attracts many inexperienced, low time pilots who shouldn't even be considering it.

    A "simple" or "easy" aircraft doesn't always mean it's a "safe" aircraft. A Cirrus will fly a precision approach for you, but thats only if you set up the autopilot to fly it correctly. And in that, brings up another point. Many Cirrus-owners feel that "hey it has a chute, I just need enough training to meet the insurance requirement and then lets go." The chute itself is in fact used as a joke by the fairly experienced Cirrus-owners in the field. A common joke between those experienced owners goes something like this: "Hey bob, it has a chute let's go!!!" but it is that phrase exactly that is used seriously by inexperienced pilots.

    You can never have enough training!! Both the SR20 and SR22 have limited required dual instruction that is required when purchasing one...however, rarely do those new-owners pay for additional training. It's this additional training that the owner-pilots would become much more familiar with the workings of the airplane (despite how cheap it may be in the end).

    I don't believe the issue is necessarily the plane or its associated systems, but rather the inexperienced pilots who don't put in the time to learn it as well as they really should.

    I hate to make the analogy, but if a car manufacturer comes out with a new product geared towards "beginner" or "less experienced" drivers which gains a lot of press because of the many accidents that occur in that vehicle, would you assume that those statistics are a result of the car or rather the operator?

    Every time I hear of another Cirrus crash, I always give out the same: "Sigh..."

    Jason
    Jason
    CFI/CFII
    Part 135 Dispatch

  11. #11
    Senior Member HPNPilot1200's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    222
    Here's a letter Alan Klapmeier recently sent out to owners:

    October 27, 2006


    Dear Cirrus Owners,

    As you may know, there have recently been several fatal accidents involving Cirrus aircraft. We at Cirrus are deeply saddened by these tragedies, and we offer our sincere condolences to those who have lost family and loved ones as a result of these accidents. We know you all share these sentiments

    Historically, weather has been one of the most significant risk factors affecting general aviation. This is particularly true now when the onset of winter weather brings lower ceilings and visibilities, increased likelihood of icing conditions as well as increased night flying. We, as prudent pilots, must adjust our decision making to the new season.

    Cirrus offers several tools to help reduce the risks associated with adverse weather accidents - these include:
    • Airplane systems such as weather data link graphics and terrain awareness and warning system.
    • Training on risk management, including setting personal weather minimums.
    • Cirrus’ AFM, training materials, and website containing numerous relevant safety resources.

    You can also find other resources to help you fly safely at the Cirrus Owners and Pilots Association (COPA) website cirruspilots.org

    We each need to make a personal commitment to flying more safely. As a Cirrus pilot I intend to take the following steps today:

    • Review the Envelope of Safety at cirruslink.com/mycirrus
    • Review my personal weather minimum
    • Review winter weather flying techniques, including reviewing the AFM sections on the TKS system if it is installed
    • Review methods of getting the best weather information before flying and how to use available in flight weather information to complete my trip safely.
    • Review all my alternatives while flying.

    As Cirrus pilots, we owe ourselves, our passengers, and our families a professional approach to operating our airplanes. More than anything else, this means safety. It means that we are proficient at risk management, information management, and aircraft automation management – all the things that Cirrus transition and recurrent training are intended to support.

    Please take advantage of the resources that Cirrus and COPA have provided to you to enable you to fly at the highest level of safety. Together we must increase our continued focus on safety. Please think about safety!

    Alan Klapmeier
    Cirrus Design Co-Founder & CEO
    Jason
    CFI/CFII
    Part 135 Dispatch

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •