Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Small CT Town Spending $70K To Fight New Flight Paths

  1. #1
    Moderator Matt Molnar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    9,302

    Small CT Town Spending $70K To Fight New Flight Paths

    These people are morons...they're 50 miles from LGA, they're not going to hear anything!

    Ridgefield Press:
    SKY NOISE: Despite objections, money for FAA fight OKed
    Feb 12, 2008

    By Jenny Cox, Ridgefield Press Staff

    After some heated argument, voters at a town meeting last week approved spending $70,000 for Ridgefield to join the Alliance for Sensible Airspace Planning.

    Ridgefield is “one of the last” of a dozen local towns to join the alliance in an effort to change the Federal Aviation Authority’s proposed airspace redesign, First Selectman Rudy Marconi said.

    The plan is to fight the proposal to rerouting New York airport traffic over Connecticut, by simultaneously pursuing legal, lobbying and “grass roots” opposition, he said. The aviation authority has approved a redesign that some people have compared to “putting an I-95 directly above us,” he said. Read more...
    Ladies and gentlemen, this is your captain speaking. We have a small problem.
    All four engines have stopped. We are doing our damnedest to get them under control.
    I trust you are not in too much distress. —Captain Eric Moody, British Airways Flight 9

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    Within earshot of MD-80s who don't "Over fly Prospect Park to the extent practical"
    Posts
    1,517

    Re: Small CT Town Spending $70K To Fight New Flight Paths

    Is the FAA actually paying any attention to these people? I sure hope not...

  3. #3
    Senior Member HPNPilot1200's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2006
    Location
    Northeast
    Posts
    222

    Re: Small CT Town Spending $70K To Fight New Flight Paths

    I live in the adjacent town to Ridgefield and am having a hard time figuring out why my town is contributing over $37,000 to this cause. The only aircraft flying over our heads are heavy transatlantic departures headed to MERIT or GREKI intersection, bound for Europe (which by the way, are well above 10,000 feet) and a few arrivals into LGA and HPN (HPN arrivals being the lowest descending through 5 or 6,000 feet for 3,000 feet). Not much else.

    I really don't see their point. Then again, no one in the town asked me.
    Jason
    CFI/CFII
    Part 135 Dispatch

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    new york
    Posts
    689

    Re: Small CT Town Spending $70K To Fight New Flight Paths

    Thats just stupid. If people in Flushing, Elizabeth or Jamaica wanted to fight the fight plans, that I can understand. The planes will be high, and they wouldn't be bothersome. I live in Westchester, and sometimes we get low flying LGA traffic. (and sometimes EWR 22 departures to Europe). The planes by Ridgefield will be higher. Waist of tax payer dollars!

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Oceanside, NY
    Posts
    985

    Re: Small CT Town Spending $70K To Fight New Flight Paths

    Agreed. This is not a true noise sensitive area. I doubt that it will pass, unless there is a bribe.
    In loving memory of Casey Edward Falconer
    May 16, 1992-May 9, 2012

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •