Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 21 of 21

Thread: NYPD Chopper Down at Floyd Bennett Field

  1. #16
    Moderator Matt Molnar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    9,302
    Quote Originally Posted by Gerard View Post
    The crew was in good hands.
    Unless of course it was her fault...just sayin'. :-)
    Ladies and gentlemen, this is your captain speaking. We have a small problem.
    All four engines have stopped. We are doing our damnedest to get them under control.
    I trust you are not in too much distress. —Captain Eric Moody, British Airways Flight 9

  2. #17
    Moderator mirrodie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Me like the Robert Downey Jr of cooooooookies!
    Posts
    5,747
    Its on the radio. Chopper is new, about a year old.
    And I, I took the path less traveled by
    and that has made all the difference......yet...
    I have a feeling a handle of people are going to be very interested in what I post in the near future.

    http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=187

  3. #18
    Senior Member Gerard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    4,851
    Quote Originally Posted by GothamSpotter View Post
    Unless of course it was her fault...just sayin'. :-)
    I'm hearing (well reading) that it could have been a main driveshaft failure!! There have been a number of 412 accidents lately with this being the cause,some fatal. I thought
    the FAA had issued an Airworthiness Directive concerning that.
    Wonder where the "ran out of fuel" rumor started? Cos they were returning to Base to refuel? Highly unlikely. A more likely scenario is that they knew they would be airborne for an
    extended time on Presidential detail duty and being close to Base they figured they could do a quick hot fuel and load up before they needed to be on station.
    Thankfully the only thing lost was the helicopter.

  4. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    557
    I searched for an AD for the 412, I found this one. Could this be it?

    SUMMARY: This amendment adopts a new airworthiness directive (AD) for the specified Bell Helicopter Textron Inc. (Bell) model helicopters. This action requires reidentifying a certain part-numbered main rotor yoke (yoke) based on whether it was ever installed on a Model 412CF helicopter or on a Model 412 or 412EP helicopter with a slope landing kit. This AD also requires reducing the retirement life of the reidentified yokes from 5,000 hours time-in-service (TIS) to 4,500 hours TIS. Also, this AD requires recording the reidentified yoke part number (P/N) and the reduced retirement life on the component history card or equivalent record. This amendment is prompted by fatigue analysis that shows that the retirement life should be reduced on certain yokes. The actions specified in this AD are intended to prevent fatigue cracking of a yoke, failure of a yoke, and subsequent loss of control of the helicopter.

  5. #20
    Senior Member cancidas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    traffic two o'clock two miles southbound flight of four C-130s
    Posts
    6,088
    Quote Originally Posted by DHG750R View Post
    I searched for an AD for the 412, I found this one. Could this be it?
    this bird was just under a year old, so it would be AD compliant coming from th factory.
    it is mathematically impossible for either hummingbirds, or helicopters to fly. fortunately, neither are aware of this.

  6. #21

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •