50/50..the first one has some noise, the second on is slightly over sharpened but might make it through. Serigo also set the date on your camera, it shows 2004:10:18 16:22:53.Quote:
Originally Posted by Delta777LR
Printable View
50/50..the first one has some noise, the second on is slightly over sharpened but might make it through. Serigo also set the date on your camera, it shows 2004:10:18 16:22:53.Quote:
Originally Posted by Delta777LR
Ouch! thanks for the heads up TomQuote:
Originally Posted by T-Bird76
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=2714252
Any problems with composition?
I think that Geico Skytyper #3 is breaking a composition.... I like it anyway :) pretty cool picture - rare... but they probably need clear view on the plane... btw Skytypers - one of my favorite groups :))
Tossing this one out there...
http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c2...t74/c185jt.jpg
what do y'all think?
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ ... 100909.jpg
Blurry and soft.Quote:
Originally Posted by flyboy 28
my first hugeness cockpit edit....
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...nche-7581y.jpg
Looks pretty darn good to my non-screener eyes. If I could only read what the belly strobe interferes with ...Quote:
my first hugeness cockpit edit....
Keep in mind, these photos have not been touched with an editor. Also, for some reason, they appear clearer in the original file. I'm sure some (if not all) need editing, but I need recommendations on how to go about that.
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2627/...5f7b097e_b.jpg
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4070/...72ab8e6d_b.jpg
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4047/...c115c6d0_b.jpg
http://www.flickr.com/photos/47849042@N05/
Quote:
Originally Posted by sirloin
I like all 3 of those shots and I would say that they have good potential.
My main comment: If you want to successfully load to a.net or jetphotos, watch your aspect ratio. Both of those sites will want pictures in the range of 3:2 to 4:3. The KLM shot looks too square. Lufthansa looks like it might be close to 4:3, but you'll want to check it. Lingus has lot of dead space - crop to 3:2 and lose as much dead space as you can.
On my current monitor, your exposures look decent - KLM is back lit but I like it anyway. KLM also looks like it is in need of some sharpening.
Lufthansa doesn't need much sharpening in my opinion, but a.net might give you a hard time becuase of the person in the pic.
Best of luck,
Dan
Thinking about trying this one. Not sure what happened to the RR logo on the enging though. I resized this one after I cropped it before I started editing it. Anyone have any solutions and feed back on this edit?
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2086/...a4302467_o.jpg
I'm thinking way too oversharpened, and too much contrast. Knowing the sites guidelines, it's probably too low in the frame as well.Quote:
Originally Posted by seahawks7757
It's also very noisy and could use some cw rotation. As far as the contrast goes, start back with your original shot and pay close attention to your histogram.
ok, might scrub this one beacuse I shot it low and that is as centered as she is going to get and JP I know hates that, so I'll see what I do tonight.
Any advice with this one. It has been rejected twice due to horizon unlevel. I have now rotated it so that the light posts are vertical.
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=2959351
Thanks
I am working on a few 787 shots again. Some of these are first releases-
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2124/...f0e38320_o.jpg
http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2166/...d5494c46_o.jpg
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4049/...49476af2_o.jpg
I submitted the first and third
Any chance for this?
http://www.nycaviation.com/hosting/IMG_2713.jpg
Looks a bit soft all around Sergio, and due to the clouds there is very little contrast on the forward fuselage. Too bad, it's a great catch.
Could i please get a critique for these pics..
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4018/460 ... 9c2c_o.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ ... 8737-1.jpg
Much appreciated... :D
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4043/...63c60116_b.jpg What do you think?
Doug
Well you seem like you can hold that camera steady Doug but we got to work on getting good light on your subject. Your shot is too dark and try to zoom in a tad more.
anet link is not working and the BA777s looks pretty good, front titles seem a little off but probably because the fuselage is not lit evenly. Seems level.Quote:
Could i please get a critique for these pics..
This was a week before
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=3057206
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=3057187
I was at Lauderdale today and the weather was terrible!
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=3064924
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=3064918
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=3064928
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=3064921
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=3064933
any sort of tips would be much appreciated
Thanks
I like the two Spirit planes shot. Joe O
Thanks joe :D
Hi, guys! Here are a few from my JFK outing on Saturday. They're in the queue, but there are a couple I'm not convinced will make it:
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...02ua_final.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...92ta_final.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...82an_final.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...vbug_final.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...-cxk_final.jpg
Thanks, all! I'll have more images after my first round of screening, and once I'm ready to upload more images!
TIS
First one looks a little over sharpened or just a bad lock on the tail. The rest though should make it but will probably get the normal BS rejection. Also American is a little dark.
Thanks!! I'll leave them in the queue, and ask some more questions about my next batch when that goes in!Quote:
Originally Posted by seahawks7757
TIS
The AA 767 color or WB is way off too.
According to Photoshop, in that image, white is white, and gray is gray. It's just backlit (last shot of the day at Woodmere) so it looks goofy. Haha. But it's my only shot of an AA 767 with winglets from that day, so that's the best I'm gonna get. I'm leaving it in on the off-chance a screener hits "Accept" by mistake.Quote:
Originally Posted by NIKV69
TIS
Thats always why it goes through 2 screenings :PQuote:
Originally Posted by ANITIX87
Just submitted these two. Any thoughts?
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ ... esized.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ ... esized.jpg
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/big/ ... esized.jpg
any thoughts on this one? I can't seem to get the horizon level...
The ground on that third shot is going to be rough as it looks like it is unlevel everywhere period.
Thinking about trying my first attempt to JetPhotos and/or Airliners, but wanted to get a feel for whether these shots stand a chance.
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4082/...a5fc7599_b.jpg
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4079/...39c1622e_b.jpg
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4139/...50277388_b.jpg
Any suggestions/comments would be appreciated.
-Tad
#1 Looks good, don't see anything wrong with it. Just an old awesome classic bird!
#2 cut the tail off by a hair so that might lead them to being as ass.
#3 Looks good but again that hair of the tail.
And #4 I am just impressed to see you actually edit a few shots. Lookin good buddy. :wink:
#1 & #2 are really nice shots, but they may be a bit dark...basing this on my last rejection from JP. #3 looks good but as has been noted, that little bit of stabilizer you cut off may earn you a rejection.
I personally love the two Everts birds, someday I'll make the pilgrimage.