Which honestly is retarded as it is a dam good shot for being through glass and at night.
Printable View
Which honestly is retarded as it is a dam good shot for being through glass and at night.
Quality wise it sure is but the jetway just kills it unfortunately. Can't fault anet here just about anyone would agree the clutter takes away from a great angle of the aircraft at night. Like I said that shot is very tough to pull off since if he is pushing and the jetway is gone you have the tug in the way. Your best chance is when he is arriving at the gate when only the marshal is in the foreground but it's a very tough motive to nail. Worth chasing though for if you do it will be money.Quote:
Originally Posted by seahawks7757
A little help on this one from you guys, this is my 1st time submitting a DC3, do I have to check off "Warbird/Vintage" Just don't want to get a rejection for "missing categories "
Thanks :)
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewqueued_b.php?id=3491361
Definitely vintage so check it off... maybe a tiny bit underexposed? I can;t say for sure since I am at work and not calibrated :P
Thanks for your help as always sir !Quote:
Originally Posted by gonzalu
Having a go with an evening/night shot. Not sure if it is over-processed? 1000 pxl is the most I think I can get out of this one.
http://jeremyd.smugmug.com/Other/pot...8cnight-XL.jpg
Jeremy, nice image... you have the original? I'd love to give it a shot if you like... you know my E-mail :-)
coming your way! It might not resemble the image post:tongue:Quote:
Originally Posted by gonzalu
no worries.. they never do! :tongue:Quote:
Originally Posted by JDANDO
One of the first images from my last trip.
C/C please
http://jeremyd.smugmug.com/Other/pot...pn210fr-XL.jpg
ISO2500, 1/20th, f4.5 Through the glass, handheld
Unfortunately, this would get an automatic rejection just for the blocked gear.Quote:
Originally Posted by JDANDO
http://www.jetphotos.net/img/4/7/1/2...1318168217.jpg
Trying to save that one, do you guys think it has a shot?
Adam, a bit contrasty and underexposed on my screen here... Could the original stand a +1/3 to 2/3 stops of exposure compensation? IF JPG, it may be tougher to get away with it.
Very nice Mike!Quote:
Originally Posted by threeholerglory
Can someone give me a hand on finding the cn and block number for this bad boy?
http://www.jetphotos.net/img/4/1/6/4...1318076461.jpg