Parents find 'Dark Knight' isn't for kids

[Midnight Mike]

Parents should be given the "dumb-ass" of the year award. The movie received a PG-13 rating & had numerous rumors of being a dark movie...

http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/app ... 3/80721083 (http://www.greenbaypressgazette.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080721/GPG0503/80721083)

Ann Folger may be one of the few people who managed to get tickets to “The Dark Knight” on Friday — and regretted it.

Folger, 44, of Tulsa, Okla., thought she was taking her family to a superhero film in the vein of “Hancock,” a breezy action film that, like “Dark Knight,” is rated PG-13.

Instead, she found herself squirming during several scenes.

[mirrodie]

Tulsa, OK.

I love it there, I really do. Its a much better city than I imagined. A good amount of cultural diversity there for such a place.

But seriously,

Tulsa, OK. Thats all you had to say.


I cant wait for it on Blu Ray.



Oh, BTW, I felt old the other night. Remember the 'first updated' Batman flick, with Michel Keaton? Thats 19 years old now. YIKES :shock:

[Gerard]

>Parents should be given the "dumb-ass" if the year award, movie received a PG-13 rating & had numerous rumors of being a dark movie...<

THe coming attractions alone should have been a hint.
There really are clueless people around....and they have kids!!!

[cancidas]

how old were the kids this woman took to see it? wouldn't be surpised if they were 9, 10, 11, 12 and 12 1/2.