PDA

View Full Version : DOT Report Blasts FAA Regulation of Foreign-Made Jet Parts



Matt Molnar
2008-03-02, 05:05 PM
FAA Criticized In Report on Airplane Parts (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/29/AR2008022903544.html)

By Frank Ahrens
Washington Post Staff Writer
Saturday, March 1, 2008; Page D01

Passengers have flown on jetliners built with "substandard" parts, some of which may have been made in foreign countries, because the Federal Aviation Administration lacks an adequate system for checking the quality of airplane components, according to a federal oversight report.

The parts for commercial airliners such as the Boeing 727 and 737 were once manufactured almost exclusively in the United States. But the parts on today's big jets, such as Boeing's 777 and its planned 787, are made in such countries as China, Japan, Brazil, Italy, France and Australia, in addition to the United States. Boeing, Pratt & Whitney, GE and other plane manufacturers buy parts made overseas largely because they are cheaper.

...

The report cited four engine failures in 2003 -- three on the ground, one in flight -- that were traced to "unapproved design changes made by a . . . supplier" of speed sensors on engine fuel pumps. It did not cite any more recent incidents, nor did it specify the degree to which continuing problems with parts threaten to cause similar failures.

During a visit to one parts supplier, the inspector general's office observed an employee who "used a piece of paper, scotch-taped to the work surface, as a measuring device for a length of wire on an oil and fuel pressure transmitter."

...

The report identifies 17 major components of commercial airliners made by Boeing, including the wings, rudder, nose and engine nacelles. When the Boeing 727 was introduced in 1964, all 17 of the components were made in the United States.

By contrast, of the 17 major components of the Boeing 787, which is scheduled to make its first test flight this year, 13 were made exclusively or partially overseas. [Full story (http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/02/29/AR2008022903544.html)]

Matt Molnar
2008-03-02, 05:10 PM
Engine failures = scary. But a worker using a piece of string to measure wire doesn't seem like a big deal to me, probably much more efficient than a ruler, and small inconsistencies in a piece of wire will likely have little or no effect on the quality of the part.