shamrock838
2007-05-27, 07:42 PM
Greetings,
I’m a Canon EOS D-60 (circa 2003) DSLR user here and own the admittedly non-pro Canon EF 100-300mm lens … which … counting in the 1.6x image conversion factor … means I really have 160-480mm tele compatibility. Yes?
Is this 1.6x factor common to all DSLRs? If yes … and since digital is the wave of the present … shouldn’t reported tele values be amended to read … 200(320*)mm … 300(480*)mm … 400(640*)mm … with the * indicating the adjusted digital tele value. Or just the adjusted tele value?
Or is all this already assumed by all? Thanks.
Mike (shamrock838)
I’m a Canon EOS D-60 (circa 2003) DSLR user here and own the admittedly non-pro Canon EF 100-300mm lens … which … counting in the 1.6x image conversion factor … means I really have 160-480mm tele compatibility. Yes?
Is this 1.6x factor common to all DSLRs? If yes … and since digital is the wave of the present … shouldn’t reported tele values be amended to read … 200(320*)mm … 300(480*)mm … 400(640*)mm … with the * indicating the adjusted digital tele value. Or just the adjusted tele value?
Or is all this already assumed by all? Thanks.
Mike (shamrock838)