I have the white Canon 70-300 and like it, but I have my sights set on the 70-200 2.8L IS II after having one for a two-week rental period. And now I'm thinking about potentially selling my 70-300 and a non-IS 2.8 70-200 and getting the 70-200 2.8L IS II and a 2x extender.
Has anyone used both the 70-300 and 70-200 + 2X and can comment on the image quality between the two? Would 200mm+ on the 70-200 with the converter be at least as good as that of the 200-300 range of the 70-300?
I know I'll lose the 2.8 aperture when putting an extender on the 70-200, but will the degradation in quality be so bad that it would be worth keeping the 70-300?
Sorry if this is a little bit rambling--it's been a long week! :)
Bookmarks