Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: Is the B757-300 considered a "Heavy"

  1. #1
    Senior Member Spunker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Cambridge, MA
    Posts
    589

    Is the B757-300 considered a "Heavy"

    just curious
    Gene
    Gene Delaney

  2. #2
    Senior Member moose135's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    8,067
    Yes it is - "Heavy" is applied to aircraft with a Max Takeoff weight over 255,000 pounds, and the -300 has a max weight of 272,500.

  3. #3
    Senior Member AirtrafficController's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Middle Village, NY
    Posts
    2,029
    Any 757 is not a heavy. According to the FAA Order 7110.65, aircraft with a maximum certified takeoff weight of more than 300,000 lbs are considered heavy.
    Aspires to become an Air Traffic Controller at Kennedy Tower.
    http://web01.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=31094

  4. #4
    Senior Member moose135's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    8,067
    You're right, Luke, I forgot they changed the regs on that recently.

  5. #5
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Dix Hills, NY
    Posts
    669
    The weight limit for heavy was originally 300,000 pounds, but I think it was reduced to cover high weight 757's which had an issue with wake turbulence. I was not aware it was changed back to 300,000 pounds again, but if I remember correctly they do allow heavy spacing most of the time with 757's.
    It's the fares, stupid

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Houston, Texas
    Posts
    123
    I've flown both the -200 and -300 for several years. For the first few years we added "heavy" to the callsign when flying the -300. A year or two ago they came out with a bulletin that said to drop the "heavy" when flying the -300. The explanation was that ATC applies heavy jet separation for all 757's regardless, so we don't need to use the heavy callsign.

    This brings up the question: If ATC knows all 757's are considered "heavy" and apply the separation without using the callsign, why do we have to use "heavy" when flying larger aircraft like the 767, 777, and so-on? Could it be related to landing fees in some way (i.e. airplanes that use the word "heavy" are charged more for landing)?

  7. #7
    Moderator USAF Pilot 07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    1,669
    FWIW the 757 seems to have the worst wake turbulence compared to other airliners....

  8. #8
    Senior Member Spunker's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    Cambridge, MA
    Posts
    589
    Thanks everyone for the very knowledgeable answers I appreciate it
    Gene
    Gene Delaney

  9. #9
    Senior Member Mateo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    Where the PARK routing crosses the Expressway Visual 31
    Posts
    1,590
    It wasn't just the 300s, either. The ATA 752s had extra fuel tanks or something which kicked them over the 250K limit and were referred to as heavy on the radio. Of course, neither ATA nor the 250K designation exist anymore...

  10. #10
    Administrator PhilDernerJr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Queens, NY
    Posts
    12,470
    The 757 is known for the worst wake, yeah. When was that reg changed?
    Email me anytime at [email protected].

  11. #11
    Senior Member AirtrafficController's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Middle Village, NY
    Posts
    2,029
    I believe last year. Yes it is known that 757s produce one of the worst effects of wake turbulence.
    Aspires to become an Air Traffic Controller at Kennedy Tower.
    http://web01.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=31094

  12. #12
    Senior Member MarkLawrence's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    1 Miles NNW of NOVAE - KFLL - Davie, FL
    Posts
    3,940
    If I remember right the regs changed about 4 years ago - interestingly enough, the first US Airways 752W conversions under the old regs were also considered heavy if i remember right because of fuel tank adjustments (Ron Peel - I think you were the one that pointed it out to me). I know at FLL after every B752 or B753 departure or landing, anything less than a B738 landing or departing are given the "Caution wake turbulence" warning.
    Mark Lawrence - KFLL
    Davie, FL

    Community Manager NYCAviation.com
    email: [email protected]

    http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=1538
    https://www.flickr.com/photos/9633283@N04/

  13. #13
    Senior Member cancidas's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    traffic two o'clock two miles southbound flight of four C-130s
    Posts
    6,088
    Quote Originally Posted by MarkLawrence View Post
    If I remember right the regs changed about 4 years ago - interestingly enough, the first US Airways 752W conversions under the old regs were also considered heavy if i remember right because of fuel tank adjustments (Ron Peel - I think you were the one that pointed it out to me). I know at FLL after every B752 or B753 departure or landing, anything less than a B738 landing or departing are given the "Caution wake turbulence" warning.
    every airplane will get the wake turbulence advisory behind a 757 or larger. them's the rules.
    it is mathematically impossible for either hummingbirds, or helicopters to fly. fortunately, neither are aware of this.

  14. #14
    Senior Member AirtrafficController's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Middle Village, NY
    Posts
    2,029
    The change took place in April 2010:
    http://www.faa.gov/documentLibrary/m.../N7110.525.pdf
    Aspires to become an Air Traffic Controller at Kennedy Tower.
    http://web01.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=31094

  15. #15
    Senior Member Ari707's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    West Hempstead, NY
    Posts
    1,153
    Quote Originally Posted by snydersnapshots View Post
    I've flown both the -200 and -300 for several years. For the first few years we added "heavy" to the callsign when flying the -300. A year or two ago they came out with a bulletin that said to drop the "heavy" when flying the -300. The explanation was that ATC applies heavy jet separation for all 757's regardless, so we don't need to use the heavy callsign.

    This brings up the question: If ATC knows all 757's are considered "heavy" and apply the separation without using the callsign, why do we have to use "heavy" when flying larger aircraft like the 767, 777, and so-on? Could it be related to landing fees in some way (i.e. airplanes that use the word "heavy" are charged more for landing)?
    They use the heavy call sign because over the air the other planes just hear a call sign and don't know the type, this way they can tell if they are behind a heavy or not without having to know the type (Delta 127 - B737, Delta 127 Heavy B767)
    Overheard on JFK TOWER - S Turns are fine, U-Turns are bad....

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •