Page 13 of 22 FirstFirst ... 391011121314151617 ... LastLast
Results 181 to 195 of 318

Thread: US Airways A320 Down in NYC Hudson River

  1. #181
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Bronx, New York
    Posts
    3,117

    Re: US Airways A320 Down in NYC Hudson River

    They have released the NYFD dispatch tapes, warning it's almost a 24 min recording.

    http://www.nypost.com/video/?vxSiteId=a ... itrate=300

    Regards

    LGA777

  2. #182
    Senior Member Gerard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    4,851

    Re: US Airways A320 Down in NYC Hudson River

    >They have released the NYFD dispatch tapes, warning it's almost a 24 min recording.<

    Pretty intense stuff especially when the job is confirmed and they declare a "10-60" Major Incident. You can imagine what
    is going through the minds of all the first responders upon hearing of a commercial jetliner in the water. I thought the
    Manhattan FD dispatcher did a very good job and you can also hear the Bronx dispatcher in the background also receiving
    calls.

  3. #183
    Senior Member emshighway's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Middle Village
    Posts
    2,060

    Re: US Airways A320 Down in NYC Hudson River

    The Aircraft will be going to Weeks Marine on Linden Ave in Jersey City. Other recoveries have been brought there. From there would be anyone's guess.
    "The nine most terrifying words in the English language are, 'I'm from the government and I'm here to help.' "
    Ronald Reagan

  4. #184
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Brick, NJ
    Posts
    1,876

    Re: US Airways A320 Down in NYC Hudson River


  5. #185
    Senior Member moose135's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    8,067

    Re: US Airways A320 Down in NYC Hudson River

    You beat me to it Bill! Wow, what a difference a day makes, it was almost toasty warm today compared to Saturday! I was disappointed that they lifted the jet last night after we waited all day, but when I heard it was still at Battery Park City, I had to take a run in.







    That's not you, is it, Ron?




    And on JP.net:
    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=6465555

  6. #186
    Senior Member Planesntrains's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Watchin' EWR from somewhere in the 40.66 x -74.26 range...
    Posts
    176

    Re: US Airways A320 Down in NYC Hudson River

    Quote Originally Posted by Corey
    So clearly one of the engines stayed on, is the other side gone?

    Corey
    Yes. Apparently broke off on impact. They found it last night I think, using sonar. It was in the drink basically where N106US came to rest.
    Cheers,
    Matt, W2MJR

    Rookie Planespotter/Veteran Railfan
    "The movie should have been called Planes, Trains, & More Planes and Trains! Danged stupid automobiles!" -Anonymous

  7. #187
    Moderator Matt Molnar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    9,302

    Re: US Airways A320 Down in NYC Hudson River

    I hung out down there for awhile today hoping to see them move it but I gave up after a couple hours...1010WINS now says the barge is finally on the move. Oh well.

    Here are some shots I got. So many trucks, trees and people in the way, I only had my short lens.













    Bonus! Some other vehicles you don't normally find on the river: about 40 recently retired subway cars on their way to being reefed on the bottom of the Atlantic.
    Ladies and gentlemen, this is your captain speaking. We have a small problem.
    All four engines have stopped. We are doing our damnedest to get them under control.
    I trust you are not in too much distress. —Captain Eric Moody, British Airways Flight 9

  8. #188
    Moderator Matt Molnar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    9,302

    Re: US Airways A320 Down in NYC Hudson River

    Sunday evening update:

    * The barge carrying the plane has completed its journey across the river to Jersey City.
    * NYPD believes it has located the missing left engine via sonar, but will not send divers down there to verify until Tuesday due to the ice in the river.
    * Capt. Sullenberger will not appear on the Today show Monday morning as originally planned after being asked by the pilot's union to wait.
    * There is word that Capt. Sullenberger and his family have been invited to the inauguration on Tuesday.
    Ladies and gentlemen, this is your captain speaking. We have a small problem.
    All four engines have stopped. We are doing our damnedest to get them under control.
    I trust you are not in too much distress. —Captain Eric Moody, British Airways Flight 9

  9. #189

    Re: US Airways A320 Down in NYC Hudson River

    Quote Originally Posted by GothamSpotter
    Floyd Bennett is my first guess, followed by JFK. Not sure there's any room for it at LGA, and I don't think NTSB would want to move it as far as PHL and risk further damage during transport.

    I also don't think US would risk reusing any parts at this point, having been waterlogged and now partially frozen.
    I think Airbus wants it for long term examination and to avoid parts being used.

  10. #190
    Senior Member nikon50bigma's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    Staten Island
    Posts
    920

    Re: US Airways A320 Down in NYC Hudson River

    The place where it is being kept in NJ, is there any public places to see it? Or did they get it into a hanger or something like that already?
    Patrick O --- Staten Island, NY

  11. #191
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    8,285

    Re: US Airways A320 Down in NYC Hudson River

    Quote Originally Posted by Alessio
    Quote Originally Posted by GothamSpotter
    Floyd Bennett is my first guess, followed by JFK. Not sure there's any room for it at LGA, and I don't think NTSB would want to move it as far as PHL and risk further damage during transport.

    I also don't think US would risk reusing any parts at this point, having been waterlogged and now partially frozen.
    I think Airbus wants it for long term examination and to avoid parts being used.
    It’s not up to Airbus. Once the insurance company determines the damages, and I'm sure it’s a total loss as salt water has a habit of destroying anything it touches, the insurance company will own the plane. After that what happens to it is anyone’s guess. I'm sure if Airbus wants the plane something will be worked out.

    Have any lawsuits been filed yet? You know someone out of the 150 ppl on board will try to get something from US or whoever they can squeeze a dime out of.

  12. #192
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Location
    15th Floor
    Posts
    434

    Re: US Airways A320 Down in NYC Hudson River

    Quote Originally Posted by T-Bird76
    Quote Originally Posted by Alessio
    Quote Originally Posted by GothamSpotter
    Floyd Bennett is my first guess, followed by JFK. Not sure there's any room for it at LGA, and I don't think NTSB would want to move it as far as PHL and risk further damage during transport.

    I also don't think US would risk reusing any parts at this point, having been waterlogged and now partially frozen.
    I think Airbus wants it for long term examination and to avoid parts being used.
    It’s not up to Airbus. Once the insurance company determines the damages, and I'm sure it’s a total loss as salt water has a habit of destroying anything it touches, the insurance company will own the plane. After that what happens to it is anyone’s guess. I'm sure if Airbus wants the plane something will be worked out.

    Have any lawsuits been filed yet? You know someone out of the 150 ppl on board will try to get something from US or whoever they can squeeze a dime out of.
    Well the first real day of business since that accident and figure a day to be relieved...isn't until Tuesday.

    So I wouldn't say that quite yet...

    I see Airbus getting sued for not building an aircraft that can float. I see IAE getting sued for not having engines capable of supporting injesting a 200lb dog and I see the states of NY and NJ named for not having marine terminals operational.

    Being grateful for life only lasts so long...

  13. #193
    Senior Member Derf's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Miller Place N.Y.
    Posts
    4,534

    Re: US Airways A320 Down in NYC Hudson River

    They should sue Canada... a squadron of their geese flew into restricted airspace and did not file a flight plan.....Or maybe U.S. Air should give every passenger a Duck Dinner....think how one of those broken engines could be made into a roitissory with little effort! :borat: Just think, they would get a first class meal yet only paid for coach.
    The three most common expressions in aviation are, "Why is it doing that?", "Where are we?" and "Oh Crap".

  14. #194
    Senior Member Planesntrains's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Watchin' EWR from somewhere in the 40.66 x -74.26 range...
    Posts
    176

    Re: US Airways A320 Down in NYC Hudson River

    Perhaps even a free goose hunt in Ontario?? :lol:

    All jokes aside though, I really hope nobody sues. I mean, I know that's like asking lead to float (no pun intended), but they all did live! I agree with whoever it was who said that if any money is gained from legal action against either U.S. Airways or Airbus, it should all be put into a college fund for the crew's families. I mean...c'mon...they did kind of earn it on this one!
    Cheers,
    Matt, W2MJR

    Rookie Planespotter/Veteran Railfan
    "The movie should have been called Planes, Trains, & More Planes and Trains! Danged stupid automobiles!" -Anonymous

  15. #195
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    Seaford, NY
    Posts
    416

    Re: US Airways A320 Down in NYC Hudson River

    I think the TSA/Customs should be to blame for this incident.. Everyone is saying Canadian geese... but did anyone think to check their passports??

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •