Kingfisher 727-100 EWR (PIX)
This is the best I could do considering the situation. Bill's are better.
Senga
Kingfisher 727-100 EWR (PIX)
This is the best I could do considering the situation. Bill's are better.
Senga
Bill
They a good photos, the way i would have taken them would have been to get a tripod, set my camera metering to evaluation or center weighted with full auto exposure mode.
Then let the camera work it all out.
Jetinder,
I weighed out all the options what I did was really the best giving what I was up against.
I had my tripod with me but knew I would not be able to use it.
EWR isn't the place to be at 2:00am and going around taking pictures.
Bill was airside so he was able to pull out the tripod etc. Mine was handheld at 10th/sec
:)
It was shot through a fence at 800 ISO settings wide open.....I really had no other options but to shoot it the way I did.
I went back this moring to get another shot but they parked a damn COA 777 in front of the 727 now.
Senga
Hi Senga
Please accept my apology I wasn't trying to upset you in anyway.
I was just saying how i would have taken them with my camera.
At ISO 800 you got great results :)
Anyone know why the reg is US instead of Indian?
Just curious
LGA777
Jetinder,
No need to apoligize.
No problem I am not upset at all. I know how you meant it.
Ron, We have seen this before. Think of Tumps B721 VP-BDL. Its based on leagal ownership. Thats as far as my knowledge goes. Its a good thing for us as the plane will show up on the trackers. The A319CJ is Indian registered and used the Kingfisher callsign and flightnumber when it flies around. I don't think leagally the 727 can do that.
Senga
cool Pic from the Kingfisher
My Kingfisher Pic:
http://www.photos.aero/photo.php?p=32657
My Pics: http://www.flugzeugbilder.de/search4...pe=name&srng=2 My Camera: Nikon D80 / 70-300VR http://meine.flugstatistik.de/airboy
Bookmarks