Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 40

Thread: Louisiana, Nebraska, & Washington vote on Feb 09

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    The weather sucks in Seattle
    Posts
    4,899

    Louisiana, Nebraska, & Washington vote on Feb 09

    Keep an eye on the votes Louisiana, Nebraska, Washington, & the Virgin Islands
    are in play on 09-February.

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/23068044/


    A total of 158 delegates was at stake in the Louisiana primary and caucuses in Nebraska and Washington. Caucuses in the Virgin Islands offered three more.

    Clinton began the day with a slender delegate lead in The Associated Press count. She had 1,045 delegates to 960 for Obama. A total of 2,025 is required to win the nomination at the party convention in Denver.
    __________________
    The problem with socialism is that you eventually,
    run out of other people’s money.
    ” - Margaret Thatcher

  2. #2
    Senior Member Idlewild's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    386

    Re: Louisiana, Nebraska, & Washington vote on Feb 09

    Do our Outlying Islands actually have delagate clout in the primaries? Who is counting their vote, the GOP or DNC or both?
    Spotters have been Homeland Security before HS was a glimmer in the president's eye.

  3. #3
    Administrator PhilDernerJr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Queens, NY
    Posts
    12,470

    Re: Louisiana, Nebraska, & Washington vote on Feb 09

    Obama is projected to have won all three!
    Email me anytime at [email protected].

  4. #4
    Senior Member NIKV69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    IFP, ISP, JFK, IGM, SAN, VCV, LGA, LAX, SEE, LAS
    Posts
    4,258

    Re: Louisiana, Nebraska, & Washington vote on Feb 09

    The Dem convention is going to be ugly. Losing the delegates in Fla is looming large here. Interesting to see how Texas and Ohio plays out along with the super delegates. Wouldn't want to be Howard Dean for the next 6 months.
    'My idea of a good picture is one that's in focus and of a famous person doing something unfamous.' Andy Warhol

  5. #5
    Senior Member Idlewild's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    386

    Re: Louisiana, Nebraska, & Washington vote on Feb 09

    Quote Originally Posted by NIKV69
    The Dem convention is going to be ugly. Losing the delegates in Fla is looming large here. Interesting to see how Texas and Ohio plays out along with the super delegates. Wouldn't want to be Howard Dean for the next 6 months.

    I'm still confused on why Florida is being penalized. I'm even more confused that all the nominees agreed not to campaign in Florida.
    Spotters have been Homeland Security before HS was a glimmer in the president's eye.

  6. #6
    Senior Member NIKV69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    IFP, ISP, JFK, IGM, SAN, VCV, LGA, LAX, SEE, LAS
    Posts
    4,258

    Re: Louisiana, Nebraska, & Washington vote on Feb 09

    I'm still confused on why Florida is being penalized
    Florida and Michigan were stripped of their delegates by the DNC. The moving up of the dates violated the parties rules. Only way for them to count is to petition to have them reinstated which takes you to the convention or just have the states start over and do the vote again. This could be fun!
    'My idea of a good picture is one that's in focus and of a famous person doing something unfamous.' Andy Warhol

  7. #7
    Senior Member Idlewild's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Posts
    386

    Re: Louisiana, Nebraska, & Washington vote on Feb 09

    Quote Originally Posted by NIKV69
    I'm still confused on why Florida is being penalized
    Florida and Michigan were stripped of their delegates by the DNC. The moving up of the dates violated the parties rules. Only way for them to count is to petition to have them reinstate them which takes you to the convention or just have the states start over and do the vote again. This could be fun!
    As much the GOP is insane the DNC seems to consistently shoot themselves in the foot.
    Spotters have been Homeland Security before HS was a glimmer in the president's eye.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    The weather sucks in Seattle
    Posts
    4,899

    Re: Louisiana, Nebraska, & Washington vote on Feb 09

    Obama sweeps 3 states,
    Huckabee takes 2 (Louisiana, Nebraska)
    McCain is in front of Huckabee in Washington, race is too close to call.

    http://www.msnbc.msn.com/
    The problem with socialism is that you eventually,
    run out of other people’s money.
    ” - Margaret Thatcher

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    The weather sucks in Seattle
    Posts
    4,899

    Re: Louisiana, Nebraska, & Washington vote on Feb 09

    McCain edges Huckabee

    http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/p ... in10m.html


    Maine holds their election today, 10-Feb.......
    The problem with socialism is that you eventually,
    run out of other people’s money.
    ” - Margaret Thatcher

  10. #10
    Administrator PhilDernerJr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Queens, NY
    Posts
    12,470

    Re: Louisiana, Nebraska, & Washington vote on Feb 09

    Can someone explain how and why they were stripped of their delgates, and under what authority that can be done?

    It sounds as though doing so makes people's votes not count.
    Email me anytime at [email protected].

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    The weather sucks in Seattle
    Posts
    4,899

    Re: Louisiana, Nebraska, & Washington vote on Feb 09

    Quote Originally Posted by Phil D.
    Can someone explain how and why they were stripped of their delgates, and under what authority that can be done?

    It sounds as though doing so makes people's votes not count.
    The DNC stripped the States of their delegate counts when they moved up the votes, which went against the schedule provided by the DNC.

    The people still voted, it was the delegates that were removed.

    The state election boards wanted to feel special & were moving up the voting dates to earlier dates, in defiance of the DNC. States were warned about this, but, the state election boards did it anyway.

    Think of it as a baseball, imagine for a moment baseball teams scheduled baseball games that went against the schedule provided by the MLBA,.
    The problem with socialism is that you eventually,
    run out of other people’s money.
    ” - Margaret Thatcher

  12. #12
    Administrator PhilDernerJr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Queens, NY
    Posts
    12,470

    Re: Louisiana, Nebraska, & Washington vote on Feb 09

    But how does this affect the voting or the results?
    Email me anytime at [email protected].

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    8,285

    Re: Louisiana, Nebraska, & Washington vote on Feb 09

    Quote Originally Posted by Phil D.
    But how does this affect the voting or the results?
    It doesn't unless the race is so close one of the candidates wants to make a legal issue of it and take it to court saying those delegates should count. Its still a bit to early with how close the race is now to say who'll get it but there are some big states coming up that can sway it.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    The weather sucks in Seattle
    Posts
    4,899

    Re: Louisiana, Nebraska, & Washington vote on Feb 09

    Quote Originally Posted by Phil D.
    But how does this affect the voting or the results?
    Like Tommy said, right now there is no impact.

    Later on if necessary they can always hold a caucus for the delegates to be awarded, but, before that happens, I would imagine Howard Dean & the DNC would make a phone call asking one of the candidates to step aside & resign.

    Don't forget, John Edwards still controls some of his delegate votes & he can act as the tie-breaker if necessary....
    The problem with socialism is that you eventually,
    run out of other people’s money.
    ” - Margaret Thatcher

  15. #15
    Senior Member NIKV69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    IFP, ISP, JFK, IGM, SAN, VCV, LGA, LAX, SEE, LAS
    Posts
    4,258

    Re: Louisiana, Nebraska, & Washington vote on Feb 09

    Can someone explain how and why they were stripped of their delgates, and under what authority that can be done?

    It sounds as though doing so makes people's votes not count.
    Not at all Phil, no alterior motives. The DNC rules are clear and were designed to keep states from making their Primaries earlier and earlier. The DNC rules are clear.

    It doesn't unless the race is so close one of the candidates wants to make a legal issue of it and take it to court saying those delegates should count.
    Actually it is the states who have been making an issue of this since the beginning. Neither seems to want to back down from having these delegates count and rumors are flying that the DNC has been asking them to hold another vote in the spring. Which the states are balking. Also remember that if the states were to do it again it is a spring caucus and not a primary. Hillary has done terrible in caucuses. The race is quite close and unless something changes this will be continue to be a huge issue since the mindset of the back room deal at the convention is already being dangled in front of us by the media.
    'My idea of a good picture is one that's in focus and of a famous person doing something unfamous.' Andy Warhol

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •