Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 26 of 26

Thread: 1/25/08 - A Tale of Two Encounters

  1. #16
    Senior Member Tom_Turner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2,193

    Re: 1/25/08 - A Tale of Two Encounters

    Quote Originally Posted by GothamSpotter
    Is there any probable cause needed to warrant performing a frisk?
    Good Question Gotham!

    Definitely for those taking pictures of airliners from a open public place where this is regularly done since before 911 is a must for any crack anti-terrorism agency.

    Three plainclothes officers? Throw in another two marked NYPD cars and two or three other officers - all the better. Excellent use of resources.

    Definitely check that ID too. See if there are any outstanding terrorism warrants :roll:

    Its not as if there is any crime going on in Jamaica, Rockaway, Howard Beach, JFK etc...

    Resume patrol....
    "Keep 'em Flying"

  2. #17
    Administrator PhilDernerJr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Queens, NY
    Posts
    12,470

    Re: 1/25/08 - A Tale of Two Encounters

    Matt's right. Many of us have been questioned, detained or patted down at some point or another....without even knowing what crime they are accusing us of. It's certainly a leap to say that it's suspicion of terrorism.

    But, I guess that's the Patriot Act for you.
    Email me anytime at [email protected].

  3. #18
    Moderator mirrodie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Me like the Robert Downey Jr of cooooooookies!
    Posts
    5,747

    Re: 1/25/08 - A Tale of Two Encounters

    Well its nice to hear two differing perspectives from at least 2 law enforcers here.

    Makes one think the law enforcement tactics are as consistent as screening standards.
    And I, I took the path less traveled by
    and that has made all the difference......yet...
    I have a feeling a handle of people are going to be very interested in what I post in the near future.

    http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=187

  4. #19
    Senior Member Tom_Turner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2,193

    Re: 1/25/08 - A Tale of Two Encounters

    Quote Originally Posted by Phil D.
    Matt's right. Many of us have been questioned, detained or patted down at some point or another....without even knowing what crime they are accusing us of. It's certainly a leap to say that it's suspicion of terrorism.

    But, I guess that's the Patriot Act for you.
    Yeah, but Phil, they're saying "You know why we have to do this" while they're doing it. I've been patted down and momentarily detained before as well, without knowing what was going on, but no officer was saying "you know why we have to do this" while that was happening.
    "Keep 'em Flying"

  5. #20
    Senior Member NIKV69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    IFP, ISP, JFK, IGM, SAN, VCV, LGA, LAX, SEE, LAS
    Posts
    4,258

    Re: 1/25/08 - A Tale of Two Encounters

    Makes one think the law enforcement tactics are as consistent as screening standards
    Of course they are Mario! Come on if they weren't our acceptance ratios would all be 100% :borat:

    Seriously it's apples and oranges. Not every LO encounter is going to be the same. Sure being patted down may at first seem extreme. Again we are dealing with human beings so you are not going to get the same thing every time. Some officers may pat down in a certain situation where some others won't. When I had my encounter at ISP they didn't pat me down yet they searched my car. I could care less. I had nothing to hide. The female officer was a total idiot the whole encounter. Maybe her gf wouldn't give her action the night before who knows. Then I had to tell her to go screw when she wanted my SS#. No way I was giving that out. She didn't like that but it had to be more BS because when homeland security came to my house they didn't ask for it. As Phil said in this post 9/11 era we are probably never going to be like we were before.
    'My idea of a good picture is one that's in focus and of a famous person doing something unfamous.' Andy Warhol

  6. #21
    Senior Member Gerard's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2007
    Location
    Long Island
    Posts
    4,851

    Re: 1/25/08 - A Tale of Two Encounters

    >She didn't like that but it had to be more BS because when homeland security came to my house they didn't ask for it<
    They came to your house?

    >As Phil said in this post 9/11 era we are probably never going to be like we were before.<
    That is an absolute certain.

  7. #22
    Senior Member lijk604's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    4 air miles SE of ISP.
    Posts
    4,143

    Re: 1/25/08 - A Tale of Two Encounters

    Quote Originally Posted by Gerard
    >She didn't like that but it had to be more BS because when homeland security came to my house they didn't ask for it<
    They came to your house?
    They've been to mine, and it was TWO WEEKS after I had taken photos. Oh yeah, and I wasn't near the airport at the time. I was 1/2 mile away from the airport in a public parking lot (although it was on final for 24).

  8. #23
    Senior Member NIKV69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    IFP, ISP, JFK, IGM, SAN, VCV, LGA, LAX, SEE, LAS
    Posts
    4,258

    Re: 1/25/08 - A Tale of Two Encounters

    They came to your house?
    Yep, I was approached by SCPD about 5pm, they knocked on my door 9pm.
    'My idea of a good picture is one that's in focus and of a famous person doing something unfamous.' Andy Warhol

  9. #24
    Moderator mirrodie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Me like the Robert Downey Jr of cooooooookies!
    Posts
    5,747

    Re: 1/25/08 - A Tale of Two Encounters

    Quote Originally Posted by NIKV69
    They came to your house?
    Yep, I was approached by SCPD about 5pm, they knocked on my door 9pm.
    Whoa, when did they come to your house? Did you let them in? What exactly went on and how much of your time did they take?

    On one hand, I'm somewhat impressed that they showed up at your place. On the other, it makes me doubt the investigative techniques of the department that initially questioned you.
    And I, I took the path less traveled by
    and that has made all the difference......yet...
    I have a feeling a handle of people are going to be very interested in what I post in the near future.

    http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=187

  10. #25
    Senior Member NIKV69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    IFP, ISP, JFK, IGM, SAN, VCV, LGA, LAX, SEE, LAS
    Posts
    4,258

    Re: 1/25/08 - A Tale of Two Encounters

    Whoa, when did they come to your house
    The evening after I got approached by SCPD in the bank lot at ISP. April 04'?

    Did you let them in
    No I told them to go away, of course I let them in. Why wouldn't I? Mi casa es su casa.

    What exactly went on and how much of your time did they take?
    There was two of them. One was homeland security and the other was SCPD. The SC detective was aware of my cousin who is a Chief Inspector with SCPD and at the time was a Captain and a very respected homicide detective while he was coming up. He brought that up and things were very cordial. They sat at the kitchen table, I offered them a drink which they refused. They asked me why I took pics of planes and what I do with them. I told them about anet and they wrote it down and thanked me and left. They were probably in my house for no more than 10 mins.

    Here is my momento.



    'My idea of a good picture is one that's in focus and of a famous person doing something unfamous.' Andy Warhol

  11. #26
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Astoria, NY
    Posts
    104

    Re: 1/25/08 - A Tale of Two Encounters

    I'm not a lawyer, but from my reading of the law (and a report issued by the New York AG's office a while back), the frisks and requests for ID may not have been on firm legal grounds.

    New York state actually has stricter laws regulating police-citizen encounters than the federal government does. A 1976 appellate court decision, People v. De Bour, lays out four levels of intrusiveness, and the standards needed for each. Any police officer can approach and talk with any person at any time -- that's fine. (They're allowed, apparently, to ask "nonthreatening questions" about your "identity, reason for being at a particular location, or travel plans, where the request is 'supported by an objective, credible reason, not necessarily indicative of criminality.'")

    The second level of intrusiveness (the "common-law right of inquiry") requires a founded suspicion that "criminal activity is afoot" (and not necessarily that you're the one instigating it.) This suspicion allows the officer to ask more questions beyond the ones laid out above, ask for explanations, et cetera. The difference between this and the first level is pretty subtle, and apparently comes down to how intimidating the encounter is.

    The third level requires "reasonable suspicion" of criminality, and roughly corresponds to a "Terry stop" as described in federal case law. This is where New York state's stop-and-identify law comes into play, and the police may legally demand ID, frisk you, and detain you. (The patdown search is for when an officer has a reasonable fear that he or she "is dealing with an armed and dangerous individual"...which seems a bit much for the average planespotter, who isn't carrying anything more threatening than a long lens and maybe a radio.)

    The fourth level is an arrest, which requires "probable cause" that you have committed or are committing a crime.

    Any cop can ask you for ID or for your permission to frisk you or search your car, but they can't order you to show ID or submit to a search unless they have "reasonable suspicion that criminal activity is afoot." You are perfectly within your rights to politely ask if you are free to go, to refuse to show ID, and to walk away. The Supreme Court has held that refusal to answer a police officer's questions does not in itself constitute "reasonable suspicion." (New York state law agrees with this point.)

    Let me be clear here: I'm not for a moment advocating not cooperating with the police, and I know that they have a difficult, dangerous, ill-paying job to do. I think that by far the easiest way to deal with a police encounter is to allay their suspicions by giving them what they want. But I also think it's important to know your rights.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •