Page 1 of 92 123451151 ... LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 1369

Thread: Post Your Recent REJECTIONS!

  1. #1
    Administrator PhilDernerJr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Queens, NY
    Posts
    12,470

    Post Your Recent REJECTIONS!

    Well, we have a thread for acceptances, but how about a palce to show the photos that people wouldn't otherwise get to see?

    Post links to your rejected JetPhotos.net or Airliners.net photos here!

    PLEASE do not use this thread for complaining. There is a clear difference between showing disappointment for a rejection and complaining.

    Post em!
    Email me anytime at [email protected].

  2. #2

  3. #3

  4. #4
    Administrator PhilDernerJr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Queens, NY
    Posts
    12,470
    Quote Originally Posted by Iberia A340-600
    The only problem is that I think the links will no longer work after 7 days?
    I thought about this. Often, the older replies, especially the ones 7 days old, will be buried and no longer looked at by people. Since people will post them here probably within the first day of being rejected, I doubt many will end up looking at bad links.

    Folks are also welcome to use other hosting sites for their pics, as many do.

    Also keep in mind that Airliners.net rejections often go to MyAviation.net (if you selected that), which is permanant.
    Email me anytime at [email protected].

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Bronx, New York
    Posts
    3,117
    Great thread idea Phil. Some of us, myself VERY MUCH included have shots that don't make the grade but we still want to share with the group and maybe the world. So here is my first of many for this thread I'm sure, this is from yesterday. This A-380 shot was just to soft and my weak PS skills could not get it any better. While it is soft I like the angle showing off the flaps and the white belly illuminated by the snow on the ground !

    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1361704

    Cheers

    Ron Peel

  6. #6
    Senior Member MarkLawrence's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    1 Miles NNW of NOVAE - KFLL - Davie, FL
    Posts
    3,910
    Darn - I'll have to work on this one a little - first time I'd seen Caribbean Star - too much/little contrast - this was one of my first raw pictures too...

    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1361752
    Mark Lawrence - KFLL
    Davie, FL

    Community Manager NYCAviation.com
    email: [email protected]

    http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=1538
    http://amateuravphoto.blogspot.com

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Westchester NY
    Posts
    164
    Now that I look at it its kind of dark, but it got rejected for not being centered.

    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1362270
    Jordan Greene. - Happy Jetting

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    8,285
    Quote Originally Posted by Greeney
    Now that I look at it its kind of dark, but it got rejected for not being centered.

    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1362270
    Jordan the Bad Composition (bad framing / aircraft not centered) rejection doesn't just mean centering. When a photo is sized to an odd size we use this rejection to. In your case you edited the photo to 823x670. The pic itself is pretty much centered just the size is odd.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Westchester NY
    Posts
    164
    Quote Originally Posted by T-Bird76
    Quote Originally Posted by Greeney
    Now that I look at it its kind of dark, but it got rejected for not being centered.

    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1362270
    Jordan the Bad Composition (bad framing / aircraft not centered) rejection doesn't just mean centering. When a photo is sized to an odd size we use this rejection to. In your case you edited the photo to 823x670. The pic itself is pretty much centered just the size is odd.
    That makes sense, that was my first upload to JPnet, so I was a little confused
    Jordan Greene. - Happy Jetting

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    632
    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1361986

    This one was rejected as "overexposed." I don't know if my monitor calibration differs that much from JP screeners, but I've had a couple of others rejected for same (e.g, A380 photos) and I end up toning down the image so that it looks underexposed on my monitor. There aren't (m)any blown highlights, according to ACR, so is there just something I'm missing?
    Phil Gengler - NYCA's "other Phil"

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    DTW
    Posts
    2,751
    Quote Originally Posted by pgengler
    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1361986

    This one was rejected as "overexposed." I don't know if my monitor calibration differs that much from JP screeners, but I've had a couple of others rejected for same (e.g, A380 photos) and I end up toning down the image so that it looks underexposed on my monitor. There aren't (m)any blown highlights, according to ACR, so is there just something I'm missing?
    Yeah, I would deffinatly say that is overexposed.
    nwa FOREVER!

  12. #12
    Senior Member JRadier's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    AMS, The Netherlands
    Posts
    209
    Quote Originally Posted by pgengler
    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1361986

    This one was rejected as "overexposed." I don't know if my monitor calibration differs that much from JP screeners, but I've had a couple of others rejected for same (e.g, A380 photos) and I end up toning down the image so that it looks underexposed on my monitor. There aren't (m)any blown highlights, according to ACR, so is there just something I'm missing?
    There are no real highlites, but it is too light in general.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Brick, NJ
    Posts
    1,876
    whats your guys take on these 2:
    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1363207
    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1363077
    On the second one I only resized and sharpened.. so whats bad processing?

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    Brick, NJ
    Posts
    1,876
    Disregard the second one, I appealed it and they accepted it

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    8,285
    Quote Originally Posted by njgtr82
    whats your guys take on these 2:
    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1363207
    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1363077
    On the second one I only resized and sharpened.. so whats bad processing?
    The first one is dead on with the rejection. Not sure if you can save it.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •