Post Your Recent REJECTIONS!

[Cary]

Wow, I think this is the most rejection reasons I've had on a single photo. I especially don't agree with the color cast point. I have a feeling the screener thinks the gray on the bottom of the fuselage is too blue, but from other pictures of the airline, it IS a cool gray color.

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rej ... G_5325.jpg

The image quality of these photo(s) does not meet the very high standards
of Airliners.Net. This does not mean that it is a bad photo, but it does
mean that we think it has certain (possibly minor) flaws.

There is a problem with the colours in these photo(s). This may be due to
one of two reasons: either there is a strong colour cast that makes the
photo(s) look too red/blue/yellow etc., or you seem to be using a low
colour depth in your photos.

There is a problem with the contrasts in these photo(s). The whites in the
image are not pure white, or the blacks are not pure black.

The overall impression of these photo(s) is too dark. This may be due to
incorrect exposure settings for your camera or scanner, or it may be
because the photo was taken in difficult light conditions.

[wunaladreamin]

Soft?
Color?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections...aerolineasargenitnas_lvbmt.jpg

Anyone seeing something I'm not?

[Delta777LR]

Soft?
Color?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections...aerolineasargenitnas_lvbmt.jpg

Anyone seeing something I'm not?

Kenny I dont see anything too wrong with it, the color looks well. nice and sharpened. I dont see nothing wrong with the picture....

[Corey]

Soft?
Color?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections...aerolineasargenitnas_lvbmt.jpg

Anyone seeing something I'm not?

Looks like a blue cast on my monitor. Does this look better?



Corey

[T-Bird76]

Soft?
Color?

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/rejections...aerolineasargenitnas_lvbmt.jpg

Anyone seeing something I'm not?

Looks like a blue cast on my monitor. Does this look better?



Corey

Looks overprocessed to me.

[MarkLawrence]

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2185375

Am I looking wrong - the aircraft is blurry?

[G-BOAD]

Normally I understand the rejection reasons, but I am puzzled by these. Can anyone help?

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2188075
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2188066
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2188109 (It's a night shot, it's dark at night, thats why the photo is "dark")

Thanks

[moose135]

Not sure on the "Overprocessed" rejections, Mat - that's always a tough one for me to judge.

On the night shot, I think your problem is that the subject of the shot, the Virgin 744, is just too dark and hard to see. I have a bunch of "night" shots on JP.net. If you look at them, you will see that the main subject is typically fairly well lit despite being a night shot. In your shot, the sunset looks to be the main subject. Also, I'm not a fan of the way the 744 is cut off - I'm sure there wasn't much you could do about framing the shot, but it looks a little awkward to me.

[Jetinder]

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2188109 (It's a night shot, it's dark at night, thats why the photo is "dark")

It looks like a "just after" sunset shot, that is perfect, it very pretty as orangey light of the sky high lights part of the 747.

[N75715]

http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=2180675

http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=2180667

http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=2180666

http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=2180664

http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=2180661

All this - after they tell me my photos can't be over 1024 wide. so I crop them to conform to their size demands, and then they reject me because of size ratio and cropping?!?!?! it's getting old already.. at least on Flickr, and here, what we post, stays up and everyone wins. anyone else have a "size" problem??? any opinions? i would love to hear some feedback! thanks! Roman

[wunaladreamin]

Roman, take a deep breath. You need to crop in a 3:2 or 4:3 ratio (6" X 4" or 8" X 6") to avoid such rejections. Also cropping closer to the aircraft will help a lot. Don't be discouraged, try visiting the jp digital processing forums. You can get a much better idea of what the screeners are looking for in those forums.

Where were you shooting those belly shots? Burger King?

[T-Bird76]

http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=2180675

http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=2180667

http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=2180666

http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=2180664

http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=2180661

All this - after they tell me my photos can't be over 1024 wide. so I crop them to conform to their size demands, and then they reject me because of size ratio and cropping?!?!?! it's getting old already.. at least on Flickr, and here, what we post, stays up and everyone wins. anyone else have a "size" problem??? any opinions? i would love to hear some feedback! thanks! Roman

The guidelines for size format are the following. There are some other issues with those photos as well, to much contrast and a couple of them could use a touch more sharpening.

1.2 Image Formats

Photos should be uploaded between 4:3 or 3:2 format. Those formats are typically used by almost all digital cameras, so that any changes to the format can only be achieved by deliberately cropping the photo differently. A photo outside these size ratios will be rejected using the rejection reason "Cropping / Photo edges".

To make it easier for you here are the typical sizes for both ratios.

4:3 3:2
800 x 600
1024 x 76
1280 x 960
1600 x 1200
800 x 533
1024 x 681
1200 x 800
1600 x 1067

Example: a photo of 1024 px should be between 681 and 768 pixels high.

[MarkLawrence]

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/reje ... -Large.jpg

This was rejected for quality and motiv - I'd love to know what Motiv of a.net this broke because I read through their motiv section on their rejections and couldn't find what was at fault - I also question the quality rejection, but, that's my opinion...

[stuart schechter]

They don't like pictures of planes :mrgreen:

[wunaladreamin]

Mark, I don't get the motiv either but, she is a bit grainy in the sky and the wing is showing jaggies (on my monitor at least). Whaddaya tryin' to rub the EK 772 in my face man?!?!?! Great sets from JFK btw!