Page 70 of 92 FirstFirst ... 206066676869707172737480 ... LastLast
Results 1,036 to 1,050 of 1369

Thread: Post Your Recent REJECTIONS!

  1. #1036
    Senior Member JDANDO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    KMSP, KANE
    Posts
    863
    Any idea on what horizon I should be leveling to in this shot? Shooting these 3/4 shots rather than straight on is still giving me fits



    http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=3816965
    Jeremy in Minnesota

    My pictures on jp.net

  2. #1037
    Senior Member gonzalu's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    The Bronx, New York
    Posts
    6,028
    You can use the fence or trees in bg :-)

    Manny Gonzalez
    Thrust Images | General Photography | R.I.P. Matt Molnar 1979-2013
    BRING BACK THE KJFK/KLGA OBSERVATION DECKS

  3. #1038
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    25
    A bit of a pedantic rejection I will agree Cary (I didn't screen this one). if you look at the horizontals on the buildings right and left though, they do indicate a bit of cw required. However, I would probably have HQ'd the image because it looks level for the most part. When I get rejections like this I just adjust a bit and re-upload.

    I'm not trying to defend the screening process - it will have flaws as there are many humans involved in judging photography which is very subjective in nature.

  4. #1039
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    25
    Jeremy if I was screening your Delta CRJ, I would immediately drag the window to the right side of my monitor and look at those three grey posts under the horizontal stabilizer. That indicates it needs some CCW rotation.

  5. #1040
    Senior Member lijk604's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    4 air miles SE of ISP.
    Posts
    4,143
    Quote Originally Posted by alevik View Post
    A bit of a pedantic rejection I will agree Cary (I didn't screen this one). if you look at the horizontals on the buildings right and left though, they do indicate a bit of cw required. However, I would probably have HQ'd the image because it looks level for the most part. When I get rejections like this I just adjust a bit and re-upload.

    I'm not trying to defend the screening process - it will have flaws as there are many humans involved in judging photography which is very subjective in nature.
    So even with Cary overlaying perfectly level vertical lines on the buildings on BOTH sides of the photo, AND a perfectly horizontal line with the ground, you still think it needs CW rotation? This my friend is one of the reasons people are not uploading to that site as much. It's almost as if they are looking to reject excellent photos just to say they can.

  6. #1041
    Senior Member Kris V's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2012
    Location
    Anchorage, Alaska/ Fairbanks,Alaska
    Posts
    299
    No Motive on this one...I am baffled.
    http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3826433

    I thought JP loved air->ground shots??

  7. #1042
    Senior Member Cary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    1,985
    Quote Originally Posted by Kris V View Post
    No Motive on this one...I am baffled.

    I thought JP loved air->ground shots??
    Unfortunately, your plane's shadow is hurting the quality of the main subject...that's the reason for the Motive rejection.
    General Photography - Website | Instagram
    PlaneCaptures - Website | Instagram

  8. #1043
    Senior Member Cary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    1,985
    Quote Originally Posted by alevik View Post
    A bit of a pedantic rejection I will agree Cary (I didn't screen this one). if you look at the horizontals on the buildings right and left though, they do indicate a bit of cw required. However, I would probably have HQ'd the image because it looks level for the most part. When I get rejections like this I just adjust a bit and re-upload.

    I'm not trying to defend the screening process - it will have flaws as there are many humans involved in judging photography which is very subjective in nature.
    Thanks for the response. As for using the horizontals for leveling, those buildings are skewed to the runway, so they wouldn't make for accurate guides. Even in my adjusted (accepted) photo, the building horizontals are still slanted. That being said, since it is now in the database, I have nothing more to add, as it will just bring about more stress :)
    General Photography - Website | Instagram
    PlaneCaptures - Website | Instagram

  9. #1044
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    25
    Quote Originally Posted by lijk604 View Post
    So even with Cary overlaying perfectly level vertical lines on the buildings on BOTH sides of the photo, AND a perfectly horizontal line with the ground, you still think it needs CW rotation? This my friend is one of the reasons people are not uploading to that site as much. It's almost as if they are looking to reject excellent photos just to say they can.
    You must have missed the part where I said I would have given it HQ.... that is not a rejection but a vote to accept. Don't let your predetermined notions get in the way of reading to understand.

    Not sure where you get the not uploading to site as much. The daily uploads are higher than I can remember since I started screening a few years ago.

  10. #1045
    Senior Member megatop412's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Philadelphia(south Jersey, actually)
    Posts
    3,283
    Quote Originally Posted by jerslice View Post
    Cary, there's a simple solution: stop caring. :-). A site that is that bent on rejecting photos probably isn't worth the time spent on it :)
    When I think of all the time I spent doin the nasty(something constructive) instead of wasting valuable life time trying to conform to their craziness(in the insane belief that somehow, having pictures on there will bring me some kind of recognition and somehow my life is now worth living).....it makes me smile

    They should take a clue from the Roman Empire

  11. #1046
    Senior Member seahawks7757's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Edgewood, Washington, United States
    Posts
    1,241
    I'm about ready to give up on A.Net, something like 0 for 30 in my recent uploads.

    This one was rejected for quality, I have looked at it on 4 different screens and fail to see where the quality issue is.

    http://www.flickr.com/photos/seahawk...n/photostream/


    Then the head screener gave me an ass of a response back that I need to be more judgemental of my pics. If I thought they were crap I wouldn't have uploaded them in the first place.

    To be honest I would be happy to have my last shot be the all blacks I had accepted a while ago-
    Last edited by seahawks7757; 2012-05-24 at 01:44 PM.
    http://brandonsaviationblog.blogspot.com/ My continuing updated Aviation Blog
    http://www.flickr.com/photos/seahawks7757/ My continuing updated photostream from BFI and sometimes SEA

  12. #1047
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Queens NY
    Posts
    1,360
    I do not mess with Anet, so I personally do not know exactly what they want, but WHAT is wrong with the quality of this pic? Everything looks pretty damn good in my eyes, what are they expecting!
    Kaz T

    My Photos:

    JetPhotos
    KT Images NY

  13. #1048
    Senior Member gonzalu's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    The Bronx, New York
    Posts
    6,028
    Brandon, I think the image is terrific. However, for A.net, in my own opinion given my own experience, it looks to be a bit oversharpened in some areas and too contrasty and too dark on the belly/shadow areas.

    The crop does not work for me either and I have been rejected for similar crops in the past so I stay away from them.

    Regardless of the A.net metrics, I like the shot :-)
    Manny Gonzalez
    Thrust Images | General Photography | R.I.P. Matt Molnar 1979-2013
    BRING BACK THE KJFK/KLGA OBSERVATION DECKS

  14. #1049
    Senior Member Cary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    1,985
    Quote Originally Posted by seahawks7757 View Post
    This one was rejected for quality, I have looked at it on 4 different screens and fail to see where the quality issue is.
    The problem is that the paint scheme is completely crummy. It should look more like this:


    Seriously though, I agree with Manny - oversharpened and the crop is a little weak. If the engine wasn't blocking so much fuselage, it might work.
    General Photography - Website | Instagram
    PlaneCaptures - Website | Instagram

  15. #1050
    Senior Member lijk604's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    4 air miles SE of ISP.
    Posts
    4,143
    Brandon, don't let rejections get you down. Your work is top notch, and if the screeners at Anet do not want your work, screw 'em!
    You have your blog and your Flickr account, post 'em there. Between those two and linking the pics to this site, will get you plenty of views.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •