Page 86 of 92 FirstFirst ... 3676828384858687888990 ... LastLast
Results 1,276 to 1,290 of 1369

Thread: Post Your Recent REJECTIONS!

  1. #1276
    Senior Member gonzalu's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    The Bronx, New York
    Posts
    6,028
    Here is the edit I showed you a few days ago and compared to yours... It still shows the BRIGHTNESS of the conditions yet it has some details visible in the fuselage. It is a balancing act. But you seem to be trying to force a square peg into a round hole. You are NOT playing by YOUR rules... it is THEIR rules you play by... You never get an argument from Flickr or from Facebook... or your own website. IF you want to upload to the main two databases, you need to learn how to accept the fact that the way they want the pictures is just the way they should be. In this particular case, you have many people telling you it looks overexposed and indeed it is a bit... I also think the contrast is a bit much in your last version... in any case, my edit isn't far from yours so I do not believe it is a huge effort for you to accept it as it being a bit over.

    My Edit a few days ago...



    Your image from above post

    Last edited by gonzalu; 2013-02-25 at 01:46 AM.
    Manny Gonzalez
    Thrust Images | General Photography | R.I.P. Matt Molnar 1979-2013
    BRING BACK THE KJFK/KLGA OBSERVATION DECKS

  2. #1277
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Grand Rapids, MI
    Posts
    268
    I'm sorry Manny, I thought I was taking your advice when dialed back the exposure but I guess I didn't do it enough. I will try again.

  3. #1278
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    KCLT
    Posts
    552


    Horizon unlevel (leveled it on building on the right)
    Obstructing objects (they said the AIRSTAIRS are an obstructing object? Come on now.)
    Categories wrong/missing (biz-jet?)

    Not happy with that reject.
    Adam Sheinhaus

  4. #1279
    Senior Member JDANDO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    KMSP, KANE
    Posts
    863
    Hey guys;

    Got this one from the LA trip.


    Yes, bits are cut off, but I have the most important parts :)

    Any suggestions on a better crop?
    Jeremy in Minnesota

    My pictures on jp.net

  5. #1280
    Senior Member NIKV69's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    IFP, ISP, JFK, IGM, SAN, VCV, LGA, LAX, SEE, LAS
    Posts
    4,258
    Quote Originally Posted by adscram14 View Post


    Horizon unlevel (leveled it on building on the right)
    Obstructing objects (they said the AIRSTAIRS are an obstructing object? Come on now.)
    Categories wrong/missing (biz-jet?)

    Not happy with that reject.
    Unfortunately any air stairs blocking the aircraft will get that rejection. Sucks but it is what it is.
    'My idea of a good picture is one that's in focus and of a famous person doing something unfamous.' Andy Warhol

  6. #1281
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Grand Rapids, MI
    Posts
    268
    Some A.net rejections
    Rejected: Grainy

    Rejected: Blurry


    Any feedback?

  7. #1282
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    A word to the wise...keep it under your hat...no one is to know...
    Posts
    3,027
    Grainy you can fix by changing the way you sharpen and by monitoring your ISO. Keep the iso in good light at no higher than 200. When you're sharpening, select the sky, inverse, expand by 1 pixel, then sharpen. That will cut down on grain especially in the blue channel which is by nature the most noise susceptible.

    Blurry is unfixable.
    R.I.P. Matt Molnar 1979-2013
    #DeleteThePickleSmoocher
    LETS GO CAPS!
    [URL]http://www.sopicturethis.net[/URL]

  8. #1283
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Grand Rapids, MI
    Posts
    268
    That's what I do. I shot that picture at ISO 100 and sharpened as you said, it's what I always do. Honestly I don't see anything wrong with either shot by oh well...

  9. #1284
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    A word to the wise...keep it under your hat...no one is to know...
    Posts
    3,027
    It's a.hole...I mean a.net. If its not perfection then it won't get in. I can clearly see the blur in the second shot on my iPad. Try selecting the sky, contracting by 1 pixel and add some Gaussian blur for the noise.
    R.I.P. Matt Molnar 1979-2013
    #DeleteThePickleSmoocher
    LETS GO CAPS!
    [URL]http://www.sopicturethis.net[/URL]

  10. #1285
    Senior Member megatop412's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Philadelphia(south Jersey, actually)
    Posts
    3,283
    Quote Originally Posted by deltaA330 View Post
    That's what I do. I shot that picture at ISO 100 and sharpened as you said, it's what I always do. Honestly I don't see anything wrong with either shot by oh well...
    You know there's something wrong when you're shooting at base ISO and it is still 'grainy'. That's ridiculous. Those shots look fine to me, but I'm not a screener. If you're already selectively sharpening, I wouldn't drive myself excessively nuts to please those maniacs. Hell, they can't even decide what constitutes too much 'yellow tint'

    flickr ftw

  11. #1286
    Senior Member Cary's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2007
    Location
    NJ
    Posts
    1,985
    Quote Originally Posted by megatop412 View Post
    Hell, they can't even decide what constitutes too much 'yellow tint'
    Did somebody say my name?
    General Photography - Website | Instagram
    PlaneCaptures - Website | Instagram

  12. #1287
    Program Coordinator
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Location
    Washington
    Posts
    2,077
    Did somebody say my name?
    No Cary...just relax and go back to Trenton ;)

  13. #1288
    Senior Member Jared Blech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Long Island, Ohio
    Posts
    603

    Just rejected...

    Here is mine, i can clearly see the wingtip is pretty messed up, does anybody have any advice to fix this. Also, anybody have any advice, tips, methods, etc. to help me? I also realize i should probably shoot with aperture 8-11 on Canon 100-400, the shutter speed was 1/800, which was probably too slow. In good daylight, at which shutter speed and aperture can i get the sharpest and best image for A.net. I am open to any advise given to me... and especially yours manny... haha

    EXPOSURE REJECTION.

    If someone would kindly show me what my image should look like...not necessary, but greatly appreciated. :)

  14. #1289
    Senior Member moose135's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Long Island, NY
    Posts
    8,067
    Quote Originally Posted by Jared Blech View Post
    I also realize i should probably shoot with aperture 8-11 on Canon 100-400, the shutter speed was 1/800, which was probably too slow.
    I usually shoot in Av at f/7.1 with the 100-400, ISO 100, shutter speeds end up around 1/400 - 1/640 depending light, which is plenty.

  15. #1290
    Senior Member Jared Blech's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2013
    Location
    Long Island, Ohio
    Posts
    603
    Hey moose. I still feel like my images come out unsharp, iso at 100 and everything, i feel like they are a little grainy too... Do you think this is because of my Av at 5.6, ive read many many times that you get a sharper image with 8-11. I am currently shooting with a 7D.
    Thanks.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •