Page 53 of 92 FirstFirst ... 34349505152535455565763 ... LastLast
Results 781 to 795 of 1369

Thread: Post Your Recent REJECTIONS!

  1. #781
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Queens NY
    Posts
    1,360
    Gotcha , I was pretty confused about that, I'm saying to my self I did crop them pretty tight!

    Thanks as always for your help pal
    Kaz T

    My Photos:

    JetPhotos
    KT Images NY

  2. #782
    Senior Member Zee71's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Queens, NY
    Posts
    4,361
    When cropping it should be pretty easy enough to set. Don't use free cropping. I always try to crop at 3:2 and when cropping make sure your image is centered and watch the edges.
    Mark
    Queens, NY

    My website: http://mbsphotography.smugmug.com
    My photos at: JetPhotos and ANet

  3. #783
    Senior Member gonzalu's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    The Bronx, New York
    Posts
    6,028
    Another option is to simply SELECT THE ENTIRE IMAGE with the Lasso Tool (don't use crop tool in Photoshop if you don't know how to use it :-) and then change the dimensions of the selection while holding the SHIFT KEY (which constrains the aspect ratio) or the shift key AND the alt key at the same time. The ALT key is a modifier to the first way which CENTERS your modification. Let me put together a quick video... brb
    Last edited by gonzalu; 2011-01-18 at 05:36 PM.
    Manny Gonzalez
    Thrust Images | General Photography | R.I.P. Matt Molnar 1979-2013
    BRING BACK THE KJFK/KLGA OBSERVATION DECKS

  4. #784
    Senior Member Zee71's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Queens, NY
    Posts
    4,361
    Manny......you should be a screener.
    Mark
    Queens, NY

    My website: http://mbsphotography.smugmug.com
    My photos at: JetPhotos and ANet

  5. #785
    Senior Member gonzalu's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    The Bronx, New York
    Posts
    6,028
    View this in HD... Note that I prefer the Crop Tool (unlike what I said above) because it is much more powerful But it can get you int trouble if you define your own dimensions etc. It will resize your image if you're not careful instead of cropping it. So, let me know if you like it. Remember the SHIFT or SHIFT [and] ALT while moving the control points.

    Manny Gonzalez
    Thrust Images | General Photography | R.I.P. Matt Molnar 1979-2013
    BRING BACK THE KJFK/KLGA OBSERVATION DECKS

  6. #786
    Senior Member gonzalu's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    The Bronx, New York
    Posts
    6,028
    Nah, I would suck at it I think... Maybe when I have 2500 images in the database, then I would have enough experience LOL. Although I do love to help :-)
    Manny Gonzalez
    Thrust Images | General Photography | R.I.P. Matt Molnar 1979-2013
    BRING BACK THE KJFK/KLGA OBSERVATION DECKS

  7. #787
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Queens NY
    Posts
    1,360
    You are the best Manny !
    Kaz T

    My Photos:

    JetPhotos
    KT Images NY

  8. #788
    Senior Member JDANDO's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    KMSP, KANE
    Posts
    863
    Well here is another one for the personal collection. It is frustrating, because I think it is a good shot.

    http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=3297181

    Any insight on "motive"
    Jeremy in Minnesota

    My pictures on jp.net

  9. #789
    Senior Member lijk604's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    4 air miles SE of ISP.
    Posts
    4,143
    Jeremy, My guess would be the fence. It's rather noticeable and distracting.

  10. #790
    Senior Member gonzalu's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    The Bronx, New York
    Posts
    6,028
    Thanks Kaz for the kudos... Jeremy, maybe if you had the tower in the shot... but to them, the AWOS is likely not good enough motive and yes perhaps also the fence
    Manny Gonzalez
    Thrust Images | General Photography | R.I.P. Matt Molnar 1979-2013
    BRING BACK THE KJFK/KLGA OBSERVATION DECKS

  11. #791
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2010
    Location
    Queens NY
    Posts
    1,360
    Manny, i re submitted 3 of them with the way you showed me, lest see !
    Kaz T

    My Photos:

    JetPhotos
    KT Images NY

  12. #792
    Senior Member Zee71's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2010
    Location
    Queens, NY
    Posts
    4,361
    I'm not sure what they mean by "bad motive".
    Mark
    Queens, NY

    My website: http://mbsphotography.smugmug.com
    My photos at: JetPhotos and ANet

  13. #793
    Senior Member gonzalu's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    The Bronx, New York
    Posts
    6,028
    Zee,

    Motive on both A.net and JP.net means the same thing or close to the same. It means the MOTIVATION of the shot is unclear or poor to their eyes/opinion and it can be a broad brush. Generally any or all of:

    --ANY objects blocking ANY part of the plane... even the slightest... For example, the slight shrub that may block an engine of a plane on 4L taxiing into position from Bayswater. If the fence touches ANY part of the plane. Any ramp warts... stairs, tugs, cargo bins, etc.

    --Poor crop or not motivational crop. If the crop takes away from the COI of the image. If the image is unbalanced or otherwise, motive is unclear. Say you crop a bit of the engines, or one horizontal stabilizer but not the other, etc. These rules will sometimes be forgiven if the WHOLE image is balanced. Always think symmetry ... I always try to keep my plane withing an imaginary box that's perfectly centered. If the whole thing is not centered, don;t crop indiscriminately ... always keep in mind either horizontal or vertical balance.

    --Two competing subjects and no clear winner. Say you have half a nose from one plane and 3/4s of another in the same frame. Which one is it? Motive rejection.

    There are more but those are the big ones.
    Manny Gonzalez
    Thrust Images | General Photography | R.I.P. Matt Molnar 1979-2013
    BRING BACK THE KJFK/KLGA OBSERVATION DECKS

  14. #794
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Posts
    101
    Hey everyone, I havent posted in quite sometime. I just got a rejection (here is the link http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3313161). As you will see underexposed and soft (unsharpened). I would like to know what everyone thinks and get some insight so as to improve my editing skills.

    Thanks,
    Matt

  15. #795
    Senior Member gonzalu's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    The Bronx, New York
    Posts
    6,028
    Hey Matt,

    Here is my take on it... definitely soft and slightly underexposed... You should take a look at the LEVELS and use the histogram to lead you in the right direction. In your case, there was a bit of data missing from the highlight side of the house :-)

    Here is a before and after and below that a re-work I did quickly ... I also sharpened it up a bit.





    If it is TOO MUCH for you, just step it back a bit. After I adjusted the levels, I applied a slight midtone boost via a curves adjustment. I will update this post here with screenshots of the settings...

    The levels before, and after...

    Last edited by gonzalu; 2011-02-04 at 01:42 AM.
    Manny Gonzalez
    Thrust Images | General Photography | R.I.P. Matt Molnar 1979-2013
    BRING BACK THE KJFK/KLGA OBSERVATION DECKS

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •