Post Your Recent REJECTIONS!

[SmAlbany]

Tough one, but I would imagine that if you level the line between the concrete and asphalt, it will look right.

[MarkLawrence]

Bummer....thought I could sneak this in without the obstruction rejection...

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3058606

[heeshung]

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3079386

Really would've liked to have it in; any chance for appeal?

[SmAlbany]

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3079386

Really would've liked to have it in; any chance for appeal?

I wouldn't go the appeal route. How about using a smaller picture size? Looks like you tried for the whole enchillada regarding size.

[Cary]

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...26_mg_6908.jpg

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...10_mg_6942.jpg

[NIKV69]

What they get rejected for Cary? I didn't take a great look but the Tam looks a little high in the frame and the Etihad looks soft.

[Cary]

What they get rejected for Cary? I didn't take a great look but the Tam looks a little high in the frame and the Etihad looks soft.

TAM was Color (with the note: needs some yellow in, see the reds. More contrast might help.)

Etihad was Common and Contrast.

I always laugh when I get Color/Contrast rejections, as I almost always just do a standard RAW conversion with no PP besides sharpening and cropping. Meanwhile, I see lots of accepted shots of the same plane at the same location and time that have a wide range of color balance. Oh well, what can you do? :P I decided to increase the contrast a bit on the TAM, and just trashed the Etihad.

[NIKV69]

I hear ya, the TAM does look a tad cold. What do you set you WB for shooting? I use sunny but I bump its warmer and have got good results,

[Cary]

I hear ya, the TAM does look a tad cold. What do you set you WB for shooting? I use sunny but I bump its warmer and have got good results,

I'm almost always on daylight (clear sky). Sometimes daylight tends to give a greenish tint on my 1Dm3, but it's usually spot on with my 7D/40D (which I used for the TAM).

[seahawks7757]

And good ol' A.Net gave typical rejection's-

We have had to reject the following photos:

- t1281420448.8665c-46.jpg (Everts Air Cargo Curtiss C-46A Commando (CW-20B))
http://www.airliners...48.8665c-46.jpg

A comment from the screener regarding this upload:
"poor crop"

Quality http://www.airliners...ons.php#quality

Motive http://www.airliners...sons.php#motive

Contrast http://www.airliners...ns.php#contrast

The screener(s) included a personal message to you about these photo(s).
Please scroll down to read this message.

- f1281420271.8688n777ya.jpg (Bush Air Cargo Douglas R4D-6 Skytrain)
http://www.airliners....8688n777ya.jpg

Quality http://www.airliners...ons.php#quality

Contrast http://www.airliners...ns.php#contrast

- x1281420129.779305-40908.jpg (USA - Air Force Lockheed Martin F-22A Raptor)
http://www.airliners...79305-40908.jpg

A comment from the screener regarding this upload:
"double in queue"

Quality http://www.airliners...ons.php#quality

Blurry http://www.airliners...sons.php#blurry

Dark http://www.airliners...easons.php#dark

Double http://www.airliners...sons.php#double

The screener(s) included a personal message to you about these photo(s).
Please scroll down to read this message.

- i1281420039.829205-4090.jpg (USA - Air Force Lockheed Martin F-22A Raptor)
http://www.airliners...829205-4090.jpg

Quality http://www.airliners...ons.php#quality

Blurry http://www.airliners...sons.php#blurry

Dark http://www.airliners...easons.php#dark

Double http://www.airliners...sons.php#double

- b1281419922.492906-4112.jpg (USA - Air Force Lockheed Martin F-22A Raptor)
http://www.airliners...492906-4112.jpg

Quality http://www.airliners...ons.php#quality

Soft http://www.airliners...easons.php#soft

I disagree with the douple. It's a freking Demo, it's not like the tail changes every pass or anything Also the Evert's one. Poor Crop? The point of the damn shot was to focus on the wing and front half of the aircraft. I think I am about ready to give up on A.Net and just stick with JP. I mean for the conditions I thought those were some damn good shots.

Anyone think any are worth an appeal?

[heeshung]

Claimed to be "too high".

http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=3129828

Is it really too high? Seems right smack dab in the middle to me.

[lijk604]

Claimed to be "too high".

http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=3129828

Is it really too high? Seems right smack dab in the middle to me.

Yes Mark it does appear too high in the frame. Best bet it to get the window-line as close to centered as possible. Nice shot though.

[heeshung]

Thanks, and will do.

Here are two more rejected for Bad Info: Location. I'm a little puzzled how they could determine whether it was at JFK or not; I doubt it's a mistake in mouse-clicking as both of these were rejected for the same reason.

http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=3129169

http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=3129172

Appealed.

[adscram14]

I have no idea; agree with the appeals.

[MarkLawrence]

This is becoming a bit of a mission for me - this has been rejected 4 times - each time I have followed the same work flow with saturation, etc - and the last time it was rejected for unlevel horizon - so I find the horizon, and then it gets rejected for this....anything think they can help with this one...please?????

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=3135171