Hmm, overexposed...
Fixable?
http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=2620933
http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=2620938
Hmm, overexposed...
Fixable?
http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=2620933
http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=2620938
http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=2622978
Wanted to get the moon in, but I guess it didn't work out.
Personally - I would forget the moon - that's a great shot centered in the frame!Originally Posted by heeshung
Mark Lawrence - KFLL
Davie, FL
Community Manager NYCAviation.com
email: [email protected]
http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=1538
https://www.flickr.com/photos/9633283@N04/
Guess I did a little tpp much on this - I really need to get this monitor calibrated - anyone got any step by step instructions??
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2637847
Mark Lawrence - KFLL
Davie, FL
Community Manager NYCAviation.com
email: [email protected]
http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=1538
https://www.flickr.com/photos/9633283@N04/
Got this great shot with Mark down in MIA, but I got a "Horizon Unlevel" rejection. This is a common reason, I seem to not really have the eyes for the horizon in photoshop. I tried leveling against the runway line, but that didn't seem to work. What would you guys suggest using as a reference point in this picture, the fence? That would give the picture such an awkward angle though. I am torn...
http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=2663357
You don't level to the foreground you level to the horizon the farest point in the picture. In this case the building's roof line would be what you level to. You should also use the grid lines when leveling vs. trying to do it by sight. This shot needs .3 to .4 of CW rotation.Originally Posted by kc2aqg
Sometimes when buildings are the only thing in the shot to level off of, they lie. For example, if when you crop a shot you're left with buildings that all angle away from you (ie, the roof lines are not in fact parallel to you and therefore not level to the horizon), it can be best to go with the lines created where the wall(s) meet, or with telephone polls. But many times this will not appear to be level, even though it actually is.In this case the building's roof line would be what you level to.
Rejected for "Blurry", with a note from the screener-in-training "nose a bit blurry". I don't see it...
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rej ... _002_a.jpg
And yes, it's the same photo I just posted as my most recent JP.net acceptance.
KC-135 - Passing gas & taking names!
http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=15086
http://moose135.smugmug.com
Got a bunch rejected for dirty scan/CMOS dust spots. Didn't catch them before.
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2691164
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2691162
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2691135
Are there any more that I don't immediately see besides the one I pointed out? What's the best way to remove them?
this one is rejected at A.net because bad motive, creative shot
your opinion please
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewphoto.php?id=6675382
greetings,
Jeroen
The galley of the KLM B747-400
Considering A.net takes pictures of shadows of planes on corn fields I'm not sure why this wasn't taken??? Quality is great.Originally Posted by grazysub
I dont get what happened here
http://jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2714111
http://jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=2714069
Sergio has been a huge Delta Air Lines fan since 1992!!
Sergio Cardona
http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos....e=1&display=15
Hmm I don't what's with the digital manipulation for the first one. For the AA, I don't think its blurry but the aircraft is not centered in the frame.Originally Posted by Delta777LR
Aspires to become an Air Traffic Controller at Kennedy Tower.
http://web01.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=31094
On the Scanderbeg you can see the spots where it looks like you used healing brush, the sky is a bit grainy but those spots are completely smooth. Barely visible to the naked eye, but stands out a lot if you view equalized.Originally Posted by Delta777LR
AA is definitely not blurry, but it is a bit low in the frame, try re-cropping it.
Ladies and gentlemen, this is your captain speaking. We have a small problem.
All four engines have stopped. We are doing our damnedest to get them under control.
I trust you are not in too much distress. —Captain Eric Moody, British Airways Flight 9
You have visable clone marks in the sky Serigo on the first one. The second AA shot the forward part of the plane isn't in focus.Originally Posted by Delta777LR
Bookmarks