Post Your Recent REJECTIONS!

[njgtr82]

What do they mean by dirty scan/CMOS dust spots?
I know there is one dust spot but what is a CMOS dust spot?
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1515061

You have dust/dirt on your sensor, which is why you have a few dust spots on the image. Try cloning them out and use equalize to see where the spots are easier. But don't clone while equalize is on.

[moose135]

Try cloning them out and use equalize to see where the spots are easier. But don't clone while equalize is on.

Here's a trick I learned for PhotoShop (should work in PS Elements as well) - create a duplicate layer, and equalize that layer so you can see the dust spots (actually, I select just the sky and equalize that, it helps them stand out even more.) In your layer control window (not sure if that's what it's really called) select the original layer, but leave the top, equalized, layer visible. I then clone as I normally would, but you won't see any results as you go along. When I think I've gotten them all, I discard the equalized layer, and check the original layer (equalizing if needed). If I missed any dust spots, I simply repeat the process.

[AirtrafficController]

Thanks guys I did take away the dust spots.

Another one : :cry: http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1515325

[stuart schechter]

You see how you have a line in the sky that looks like you just did it with a paint brush? The picture is also soft. I don't know if it is salvageable.

[NIKV69]

It's low in the frame and dark too. Badquality all around. Make it easier on yourself and shoot in ideal conditions while you get your feet wet.

[nwafan20]

*Categories wrong or missing*
What did I do wrong here?

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1519268
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1519263

[MarkLawrence]

Just out of interest Matt, did you have the special scheme checked? That's one I always forget.

[nwafan20]

Ahh, that must have been it, does that not auto-fill???

[MarkLawrence]

Not that I have seen - it's usually something you have to fill in yourself.

[eric8669]

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1519209
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1519206
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1519204
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1519203

Any suggestions...

[T-Bird76]

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1519209
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1519206
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1519204
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1519203

Any suggestions...

TAM
Eric you use PS correct? The TAM seems like you over did it. I'd reduce the HUE and the sharpening. Also are you deselecting the sky? If not I would. I always leave the sky as is and never increase the blueness of it, when you do it seems the entire photo looks to worked over.

Southern Air
I don't think the Southern Air is soft, in fact to me it looks over sharpened, its def overexposed. Try shooting in TV mode next time at 500th to 800th of a second, I know you have a 30D and that's what I've been using with great success.

Emirates
Same suggestion as the TAM, it’s not soft though.

LAN
Same suggestion as the Southern Air, again it’s not soft. I don't know why the screener though it was soft.

[heeshung]

http://www.jetphotos.net//viewreject_b.php?id=1519985

Now that I look at it, it is boring.

[Vince]

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1517974
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1517967
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1517949
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1517703
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1517687
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1517678
many rejections! :|

[mirrodie]

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rej ... .jpg-1.jpg


rejected for jagged areas....help?

[NIKV69]

I remember that day Mario! Pic is oversharpened. Re edit and back off the USM a bit.