Post Your Recent REJECTIONS!

[hiss srq]

Thanks for the help Matt. I am going to give it a shot again tonight. I have the orig file still.

[hiss srq]

Another crock of **** Airliners rejection.


http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/reje ... 2-redo.jpg

Soft and quality my ass.

[nwafan20]

Another crock of **** Airliners rejection.


http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/reje ... 2-redo.jpg

Soft and quality my ass.

Actually, I would agree with both of them

[NIKV69]

Ryan it looks like it could use a little more sharpening. Not sure why you got the bad quality rejection tho.

[T-Bird76]

Ryan it looks like it could use a little more sharpening. Not sure why you got the bad quality rejection tho.

Bad quality is a BS reason to reject a picture like this. According to some Anet screeners, Anet uses this reason when they feel a picture is overall "ok" but doesn't meet with their standards and they can't pinpoint what exactly they should reject it for, sort of a contradiction IMO. A quality rejection should only be given to a picture that is really bad.

[NIKV69]

Bad quality is a BS reason to reject a picture like this. According to some Anet screeners, Anet uses this reason when they feel a picture is overall "ok" but doesn't meet with their standards and they can't pinpoint what exactly they should reject it for, sort of a contradiction IMO. A quality rejection should only be given to a picture that is really bad.

It's clearly stated on anet that the rejection reason for bad quality is just that so what is the issue? It's their standards, not ours. I took at look Justin Idle's pic of the same aircraft in the same position, I am assuming they shot together but his looks a tad better and a little more sharp on this crappy work monitor. A better edit may be all it needs.

[Chris102]

Dust spots?? :shock:

Please tell me they made a mistake? I hope I don't have a dust problem :shock:

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1512508

[njgtr82]

Dust spots?? :shock:

Please tell me they made a mistake? I hope I don't have a dust problem :shock:

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1512508

try equalizing it in photoshop and then take a look at the pic... you'll know then

[njgtr82]

This was the last thing I thought this shot might be rejected for
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rej ... LN-RKH.jpg

[stuart schechter]

What'd it get rejected for. The frame that says rejected for is gone.

[T-Bird76]

Dust spots?? :shock:

Please tell me they made a mistake? I hope I don't have a dust problem :shock:

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1512508

Chris sorry to say all of those rejections reasons are spot on. You do have three large dust spots in the lower left of the picture. The conditions at the time just don't look as though you would have got very good results. The lack of light and the dark body of the helio just don't mix well.

[mirrodie]

I can see how frustrating uploading can be. I thought I had a knack for this. :| :|

This was rejected for soft.
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rej ... N17244.jpg


And this was rejected for soft and bad centering.
http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rej ... UPmd11.jpg

Can you please yield some advice guys? I'm truly at a loss especially with the CO photo since I thought it might be a touch OVERSHARP.

advice?

[nwafan20]

They do seem a bit soft, but not too bad. Just a quick sharpening should be good.

[moose135]

I'm truly at a loss especially with the CO photo since I thought it might be a touch OVERSHARP.

It's a fine line Mario. I've gotten a number of rejections on photos I thought were oversharpened. Usually when I think it's good, I give it another pass of USM. I guess it's the difference in calibration between my eyes and the screeners. 8)

[AirtrafficController]

What do they mean by dirty scan/CMOS dust spots?
I know there is one dust spot but what is a CMOS dust spot?
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1515061