Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Lexington Airport Claims Comair at Fault in Crash

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    The weather sucks in Seattle
    Posts
    4,899

    Lexington Airport Claims Comair at Fault in Crash

    Blue Grass Airport shares no blame in the Comair Flight 5191 crash that killed 49 people, and "the sole proximate cause of the tragic accident ... was the negligent and wrongful conduct of Comair and its flight crew," the airport said in court documents yesterday.

    In its response to Comair's lawsuit against it and the federal government, the Urban County Airport Board reiterated its stance that the airport is safe and said that the Flight 5191 crew made a series of errors that led to the Aug. 27 crash.

    The airport contended that either Comair failed to provide pilots information about recent airport construction and runway changes or pilots failed to read that information, called Notices to Airmen. The airport uses Notices to Airmen, or NOTAMS, to inform pilots of changes in signs, markings or construction work.

    Pilots also failed to devote all their attention to cockpit and taxi procedures, the airport alleged.

    The airport said that it cannot be sued because of sovereign immunity, which prohibits lawsuits against government entities in many instances. It is asking a U.S. District Court judge in Lexington to dismiss a lawsuit Comair filed, contending that the airport shares responsibility for the crash.

    "As today's filings demonstrate, Comair's lawsuit ignores the law and does not have the facts on its side," airport officials said in a statement.
    The airport accused Comair of trying to have it both ways by denying liability in lawsuits filed by crash victims' families but trying to spread blame in the carrier's lawsuit against the airport and Federal Aviation Administration.

    "If Comair and (its) insurance company really believe they are not liable, they should not be asking others to share a financial burden," the airport said.

    Comair spokeswoman Kate Marx said the airline wants to ensure that everyone who contributed to the accident pays their fair share of damages. It has always said it wants to pursue prompt settlement with the families, Marx said.

    Marx said Kentucky law is not so clear on the issue of sovereign immunity, echoing what some attorneys representing the families have said.

    Responding to the NOTAMS allegation, Marx said that the airline passes on all pertinent FAA and airport communications to pilots. But she could not say whether that indeed happened with Flight 5191, citing the pending investigation by the National Transportation Safety Board.

    In October, Comair filed a lawsuit demanding that the FAA and the airport pay part of any settlements or judgments resulting from the crash. Comair said that the FAA and the airport made several errors that confused pilots, who took off from the wrong runway and crashed into a
    nearby field.

    The airport's filing said "literally hundreds of commercial flights and thousands of additional private flights" had successfully departed Runway 22 without any problems. Prior flights to Atlanta in the 5191 slot departed without any glitches, including those on several consecutive early mornings before the accident, the airport said.

    Airport attorney Tom Halbleib Jr. of Louisville said yesterday that the airport was in compliance with FAA regulations at the time of the crash, and recently passed an inspection on Nov. 21.

    "We have answered their allegations with what we have always said: Blue Grass Airport is a safe airport," Halbleib said.

    The airport said Comair and its crew made several errors, which include:
    n Failing to observe and follow taxiway and runway signs and air traffic control instructions to Runway 22, the airport's 7,000-foot main runway.
    n Not cross-checking the runway heading and directional and heading instruments in the plane.

    n Failing to notice signs that would have warned them they were on Runway 26, an unlighted runway that is 3,500 feet long and too short for takeoff by the Bombardier regional jet.

    n Not maintaining "proper situational awareness" while taxiing, and failing to direct "all of their attention to cockpit and taxi procedures."
    n Not aborting the takeoff after they knew or should have known they were on the wrong runway.

    n Not taking appropriate pre-flight, taxi and runway confirmation procedures.

    Halbleib declined yesterday to discuss the specifics of the allegations.
    "I don't want to argue our evidence in the newspaper," he said.
    Discovery, or document and information sharing between the parties, has not yet begun in the lawsuit. But both Comair and the airport are parties to the NTSB investigation, meaning they have access to information not yet released to the public.

    The NTSB has not yet released information from the flight's voice and data recorders. Nor has the FAA released recordings of conversations between the pilots and control tower, despite open-records requests from numerous media outlets since the day of the accident. Those could shed light on what pilots were discussing and what they were focusing on before they took off from the wrong runway.The Tragedy of Flight 5191
    The problem with socialism is that you eventually,
    run out of other people’s money.
    ” - Margaret Thatcher

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2006
    Location
    DTW
    Posts
    2,751
    The blame here needs to be split between all 3 parties, Comair's pilots made several piloting mistakes (Like forgetting to check their heading bug to the runway heading), the FAA didn't have the proper number of controllers in the tower, and the airport, from what I understood, did NOT provide the correct information about the changes, in their NOTAMS.
    nwa FOREVER!

  3. #3
    Senior Member hiss srq's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Around here and near there.
    Posts
    5,565
    It is split both ways and there are numberous writeups on file against that airport and concerns stressed over thelayout and operation at that airport. The airport needs to be accountable for their part. Bottom line
    Southwest Airlines-"Once it pop's it's time to stop" Southwest Airlines-"Our Shamu's are almost real" Southwest Airlines -"We blow our top real easy" Southwest Airlines- "You can't top us..... really"

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    The weather sucks in Seattle
    Posts
    4,899
    Quote Originally Posted by nwafan20
    The blame here needs to be split between all 3 parties, Comair's pilots made several piloting mistakes (Like forgetting to check their heading bug to the runway heading), the FAA didn't have the proper number of controllers in the tower, and the airport, from what I understood, did NOT provide the correct information about the changes, in their NOTAMS.
    It would not matter if the Tower was staffed correctly, so the FAA should be kept out the lawsuit..... Tower staff are not equipped to watch all movement on the airport while aircraft are taxing around.....

    As to the NOTAM's:

    The airport contended that either Comair failed to provide pilots information about recent airport construction and runway changes or pilots failed to read that information, called Notices to Airmen. The airport uses Notices to Airmen, or NOTAMS, to inform pilots of changes in signs, markings or construction work.
    The problem with socialism is that you eventually,
    run out of other people’s money.
    ” - Margaret Thatcher

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •