http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060711/ap_ ... MlJVRPUCUl
I don't understand some of this. Both sides are wrong to me, and this situation has gotten very out of hand.
I agree with the Bush Administration's original position that those at Gitmo are not Prisoners of War. Why? Because they are a part of no army. The enemy that we fight in Iraq and Afghanistan has no actual organization, leadership, nor are they aligned with any government (although this last part is debatable on technicality and accusations of the Saudis, but oh well). In addition, their "army" is all over the world, being harbored in other countries as well.
I see now valid argument why these people would be treated as POWs.
With that, I don't see how they've been able to sit at Gitmo for 5 years now. Figure out what is up with each of them and try them. Get them into a Fed-Pen somewhere and leave them to rot.
I think that these guys probably are just as bad as they've been made out to be. But it's also obvious that the treatment of the situation has been very sub-par, and at this point it could result in them not receiving the proper punishment that they should.
Bookmarks