Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17

Thread: Actor Charlie Sheen Questions Official 9/11 Story

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    The weather sucks in Seattle
    Posts
    4,899

    Actor Charlie Sheen Questions Official 9/11 Story

    ctor Charlie Sheen Questions Official 9/11 Story
    Calls for truly independent investigation, joins growing ranks of prominent credible whistleblowers

    Alex Jones & Paul Joseph Watson/Prison Planet.com | March 20 2006

    Actor Charlie Sheen has joined a growing army of other highly credible public figures in questioning the official story of 9/11 and calling for a new independent investigation of the attack and the circumstances surrounding it.

    Over the past two years, scores of highly regarded individuals have gone public to express their serious doubts about 9/11. These include former presidential advisor and CIA analyst Ray McGovern, the father of Reaganomics and former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury Paul Craig Roberts, BYU physics Professor Steven Jones, former German defense minister Andreas von Buelow, former MI5 officer David Shayler, former Blair cabinet member Michael Meacher, former Chief Economist for the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush's first term Morgan Reynolds and many more.

    Speaking to The Alex Jones Show on the GCN Radio Network, the star of current hit comedy show Two and a Half Men and dozens of movies including Platoon and Young Guns, Sheen elaborated on why he had problems believing the government's version of events.

    Sheen agreed that the biggest conspiracy theory was put out by the government itself and prefaced his argument by quoting Theodore Roosevelt in stating, "That we are to stand by the President right or wrong is not only unpatriotic and servile, but is morally treasonable to the American public."

    "We're not the conspiracy theorists on this particular issue," said Sheen.

    "It seems to me like 19 amateurs with box cutters taking over four commercial airliners and hitting 75% of their targets, that feels like a conspiracy theory. It raises a lot of questions."

    Sheen described the climate of acceptance for serious discussion about 9/11 as being far more fertile than it was a couple of years ago.

    "It feels like from the people I talk to in and around my circles, it seems like the worm is turning."



    Suspicious collapse of buildings

    Sheen described his immediate skepticism regarding the official reason for the collapse of the twin towers and building 7 on the day of 9/11.

    "I was up early and we were gonna do a pre-shoot on Spin City, the show I used to do, I was watching the news and the north tower was burning. I saw the south tower hit live, that famous wide shot where it disappears behind the building and then we see the tremendous fireball."

    "There was a feeling, it just didn't look any commercial jetliner I've flown on any time in my life and then when the buildings came down later on that day I said to my brother 'call me insane, but did it sorta look like those buildings came down in a controlled demolition'?"

    Sheen said that most people's gut instinct, that the buildings had been deliberately imploded, was washed away by the incessant flood of the official version of events from day one.

    Sheen questioned the plausibility of a fireballs traveling 1100 feet down an elevator shaft and causing damage to the lobbies of the towers as seen in video footage, especially when contrasted with eyewitness accounts of bombs and explosions in the basement levels of the buildings.

    Regarding building 7, which wasn't hit by a plane, Sheen highlighted the use of the term "pull," a demolition industry term for pulling the outer walls of the building towards the center in an implosion, as was used by Larry Silverstein in a September 2002 PBS documentary when he said that the decision to "pull" building 7 was made before its collapse. This technique ensures the building collapses in its own footprint and can clearly be seen during the collapse of building 7 with the classic 'crimp' being visible.



    The highly suspicious collapse of building 7 and the twin towers has previously been put under the spotlight by physics Professor Steven Jones and Kevin Ryan of Underwriters Laboratories, the company that certified the steel components used in the construction of the World Trade Center towers.

    "The term 'pull' is as common to the demolition world as 'action and 'cut' are to the movie world," said Sheen.

    Sheen referenced firefighters in the buildings who were eyewitnesses to demolition style implosions and bombs.

    "This is not you or I watching the videos and speculating on what we saw, these are gentlemen inside the buildings at the very point of collapse."

    "If there's a problem with building 7 then there's a problem with the whole thing," said Sheen.

    Bush's behavior on 9/11

    Sheen then questioned President Bush's actions on 9/11 and his location at the Booker Elementary School in Florida. Once Andy Card had whispered to Bush that America was under attack why didn't the secret service immediately whisk Bush away to a secret location?

    By remaining at a location where it was publicly known the President would be before 9/11, he was not only putting his own life in danger, but the lives of hundreds of schoolchildren. That is unless the government knew for sure what the targets were beforehand and that President Bush wasn't one of them.

    "It seems to me that upon the revelation of that news that the secret service would grab the President as if he was on fire and remove him from that room," said Sheen.



    The question of how Bush saw the first plane hit the north tower, when no live footage of that incident was carried, an assertion that Bush repeated twice, was also put under the spotlight.

    "I guess one of the perks of being President is that you get access to TV channels that don't exist in the known universe," said Sheen.

    "It might lead you to believe that he'd seen similar images in some type of rehearsal as it were, I don't know."

    The Pentagon incident

    Sheen outlined his disbelief that the official story of what happened at the Pentagon matched the physical evidence.

    "Show us this incredible maneuvering, just show it to us. Just show us how this particular plane pulled off these maneuvers. 270 degree turn at 500 miles and hour descending 7,000 feet in two and a half minutes, skimming across treetops the last 500 meters."

    We have not been able to confirm that a large commercial airliner hit the Pentagon because the government has seized and refused to release any footage that would show the impact.

    "I understand in the interest of national security that maybe not release the Pentagon cameras but what about the Sheraton, what about the gas station, what about the Department of Transportation freeway cam? What about all these shots that had this thing perfectly documented? Instead they put out five frames that they claim not to have authorized, it's really suspicious," said Sheen.



    Sheen also questioned how the plane basically disappeared into the Pentagon with next to no wreckage and no indication of what happened to the wing sections.

    Concerning how the Bush administration had finalized Afghanistan war plans two days before 9/11 with the massing of 44,000 US troops and 18,000 British troops in Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, and in addition the call for "some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor," as outlined in the PNAC documents, Sheen stated, "you don't really put those strategies together overnight do you for a major invasion? Those are really well calculated and really well planned."

    "Coincidence? We think not," said Sheen and he called the PNAC quotes "emblematic of the arrogance of this administration."

    A real investigation

    Sheen joined others in calling for a revised and truly independent investigation of 9/11.

    Sheen said that "September 11 wasn't the Zapruder film, it was the Zapruder film festival," and that the inquiry had to be, "headed, if this is possible, by some neutral investigative committee. What if we used retired political foreign nationals? What if we used experts that don't have any ties whatsoever to this administration?"

    "It is up to us to reveal the truth. It is up to us because we owe it to the families, we owe it to the victims. We owe it to everybody's life who was drastically altered, horrifically that day and forever. We owe it to them to uncover what happened."

    Charlie Sheen joins the rest of his great family and notably his father Martin Sheen, who has lambasted for opposing the Iraq war before it had begun yet has now been proven right in triplicate, in using his prominent public platform to stand for truth and justice and we applaud and salute his brave efforts, remembering Mark Twain's quote.

    "In the beginning of a change, the patriot is a scarce man, brave, hated, and scorned. When his cause succeeds however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a patriot."

    Here is the interview:

    http://prisonplanet.tv/audio/200306sheen.htm
    The problem with socialism is that you eventually,
    run out of other people’s money.
    ” - Margaret Thatcher

  2. #2
    Senior Member Hyder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Queens, NY
    Posts
    137
    great read, i was across the river watching from my school as the buildings collapsed and my initial thought as well as everyone elses was that it looked like the building Imlploded in a series of triggered bombs. You could easily say that's what it looks like when a bulding falls, but i guess im not so eloquent with words in such a way that i can fully articulate what im trying to describe.

  3. #3
    Moderator USAF Pilot 07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    1,669
    Here's my beef with the whole conspiracy thing...

    If in fact this was a conspiracy, this would have required so much planning, secrecy and manual labor to set up, that 1) there'd be a definate papertrail and 2) this would not have been able to have been kept under wraps by even a fraction of the number of people involved.

    The fact that hundreds if not thousands of people - to include police officers, firefighters, EMS workers and strongly anti-Bush and anti-war people - recall looking up that morning and noticing definate airliners flying much lower than normal over Manhattan also makes you wonder how all of this could be a conspiracy, especially when you go with the conspiracy that there were no planes or that the towers were blown up internally.

    The reason the towers may have looked like they imploded? I think it could be very well proven that the thousands of pounds of jet fuel were mostly dumped inside of the tower and that as a structure becomes too "top heavy" it has a tendancy to fall inward and not tip over.
    (i.e. go build a mockup building out of blocks and then punch the center of it; you'll find that the building collapses on itself).

    Not to mention we'd have to be in bed with Osama bin Laden and with many terrorist groups, along with thousands of Americans who have absolutely no morals and could keep their mouths shut.

    Me thinks that Charlie Sheen does not have all of his facts straight and is a second rate actor looking for attention and publicity.

  4. #4
    Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Parker, Colorado
    Posts
    57
    This is coming from a former coke addict who obviously has no knowledge of basic physics (or the capabilities of the 757).

    The buildings look like they imploded because they did. The aircraft hitting them took out the central core, the support of the building. That alone might have been enough to bring the buildings down, but as the towers were burning, the floors (built on trusses) were collapsing in the area surrounding the impact zone.

    To model the situation: You have a model "bulding" which consists of a base, 4 long supports, one for each corner of the base. On top, you have sort of a platform, with a decent amount of weight on it. Now, halfway up, you have another sort of platform that is attatched to the legs. Remove that platform and all four supports will flex outward as the platform will no longer be holding them in place. As they flex outward the weight on top will cause them to continually flex outward until they can no longer hold the weight, and the model will collapse, just as the WTC did.

    Oh yeah and Sheen must have completely ignored the pictures of the main undercarriage bogey lying right next to the pentagon.
    I can join the mile high club without being in an airplane, you got nothin on this.
    http://www.jetspotting.com/logos/xjspotlogox1small.jpg

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    The weather sucks in Seattle
    Posts
    4,899
    I just laugh at people like Charlie Sheen, who act like they are so smart with some of their 1st grade questions.

    Their has been an independent investigation already & there have also been numerous studies as to what happened to both the Pentagon & the World Trade Center.

    Here is something, that explains how the WTC came down.


    The problem with socialism is that you eventually,
    run out of other people’s money.
    ” - Margaret Thatcher

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    8,285
    Its just another rant from another Hollywood actor who thinks simply because he's a popular (or semi popular) figure in society he can sway people's thoughts his way. Remember Shaun Penn's moronic thoughts on Katrina? Let him rant all he wants, he just makes himself look like a total fool.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    The weather sucks in Seattle
    Posts
    4,899
    Quote Originally Posted by T-Bird76
    Its just another rant from another Hollywood actor who thinks simply because he's a popular (or semi popular) figure in society he can sway people's thoughts his way. Remember Shaun Penn's moronic thoughts on Katrina? Let him rant all he wants, he just makes himself look like a total fool.
    My all time favorite is when Celine Deion went on her rant after Katrina, I have never laughed so hard! :lol:

    http://www.break.com/index/celinecnn.html
    The problem with socialism is that you eventually,
    run out of other people’s money.
    ” - Margaret Thatcher

  8. #8
    Moderator mirrodie's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Me like the Robert Downey Jr of cooooooookies!
    Posts
    5,747
    Quote Originally Posted by T-Bird76
    Its just another rant from another Hollywood actor who thinks simply because he's a popular (or semi popular) figure in society he can sway people's thoughts his way.


    yep, that pretty much takes the words out of my mouth. And for the record, I do think there is something wrong about the entire 9-11 story. I am SURE there are cover-ups somewhere and things that the public do not know. BUt maybe in 40 years we'll know, just like Pearl Harbor.


    Until then, Maybe Charlie needs something to take the spotlight OFF his recurrent drug troubles. Swaying the public's eye away from him ;)
    And I, I took the path less traveled by
    and that has made all the difference......yet...
    I have a feeling a handle of people are going to be very interested in what I post in the near future.

    http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=187

  9. #9
    Moderator Matt Molnar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    9,302
    I read about this last week on Page Six and immediately added him to the list of psychotic performers who I won't patronize, right under Tom Cruise. Not that I ever liked him or Tom Cruise, but I will under no circumstances ever buy anything that they'll get money from. They have the right to their opinion, and I have the right not to finance the mentally deficient.

    And that Celine Dion clip never gets old. :D
    Ladies and gentlemen, this is your captain speaking. We have a small problem.
    All four engines have stopped. We are doing our damnedest to get them under control.
    I trust you are not in too much distress. —Captain Eric Moody, British Airways Flight 9

  10. #10
    Senior Member Hyder's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Queens, NY
    Posts
    137
    it's just pretty amazing that two air planes could be flying at that trajectory(sp) being monitered by radar, and us being one of the most fortified military nations, to have not sent up and/or set up counter procedures to what the hell was going on. It is beyond retarded, you might say "it's easy to say that when looking back on a situation", but that is too ridiculous to have not done a single thing about it.

    But that's right, they did do something about it, they whispered the dilemma in the presidents ear and he felt like reading a book.

  11. #11
    Senior Member Ari707's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    West Hempstead, NY
    Posts
    1,153
    ctor Charlie Sheen Questions Official 9/11 Story
    Calls for truly independent investigation, joins growing ranks of prominent credible whistleblowers

    since when is he credible????
    Overheard on JFK TOWER - S Turns are fine, U-Turns are bad....

  12. #12
    Moderator USAF Pilot 07's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Philadelphia, PA
    Posts
    1,669
    Quote Originally Posted by Hyder
    it's just pretty amazing that two air planes could be flying at that trajectory(sp) being monitered by radar, and us being one of the most fortified military nations, to have not sent up and/or set up counter procedures to what the hell was going on. It is beyond retarded, you might say "it's easy to say that when looking back on a situation", but that is too ridiculous to have not done a single thing about it.

    But that's right, they did do something about it, they whispered the dilemma in the presidents ear and he felt like reading a book.
    huh?

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    8,285
    Planes were dispatched but because nothing like this happened the communication broke down as to what to do. Even though the planes were flying towards NY who would have thought they were going into buildings?? Hijackings in the past landed at some airport demanded something and either stayed or left.

    We can sit here and say this and that but before 9/11 not one person could say with confidence what would happen or how we should react if something like this happened. Here's an interesting fact about 9/11 and how the gov't had such problems with communication. Everyone thinks the FAA ordered the skies cleared; well the airlines well before the FAA grounded every plane in the U.S ordered their planes to land. Just goes to show you how unprepared we were for such an attack.

    To even think our gov't could do such a thing to its own people is beyond reasonable thought. Our Gov't isn't perfect and we've done some ****ty things in the past but this, I don't buy it. I'll say however if some concrete evidence came out saying we did it to ourselves, I'd be the first to join the revolution that would ensue.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    The weather sucks in Seattle
    Posts
    4,899
    Yep, you said a mouthfull, nobody ever anticipated a terror hijacking that would have resulted in an airplane being used as a weapon.

    The terrorist training for the airlines was for the Flight Attendants & Pilots to remain calm & do what the hijackers demand... The cockpit doors were not reinforced, a strong wind could have blown the doors down....

    How many of us when we heard of the first airplane hitting the World Trade Center thought that it was a commerical aircraft? Not I, when I heard it on the radio I thought that maybe it was a Cessna or Pipercub.

    It is so easy to look back at the events that took place on 9/11 with the same knowledge that we have now, & that is just not fair....
    The problem with socialism is that you eventually,
    run out of other people’s money.
    ” - Margaret Thatcher

  15. #15
    Administrator PhilDernerJr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Queens, NY
    Posts
    12,470
    Actors are paid to act, and that's what they need to stick to. This guy thinks that just because he held an MP5 in Navy SEALs that he's an authority in terror.
    Email me anytime at [email protected].

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •