Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20

Thread: Can the 787 land at LGA?

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    bronx,ny
    Posts
    10

    Can the 787 land at LGA?

    hi guys i like to know if the 787 can land at LGA? or its to big.dave

  2. #2
    Senior Member Ari707's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    West Hempstead, NY
    Posts
    1,153
    I just looked a Boeing Web site and none of the tech data has anything about runway lengths,
    Overheard on JFK TOWER - S Turns are fine, U-Turns are bad....

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    The weather sucks in Seattle
    Posts
    4,899
    The 787 will be able to land at LGA, but, if an airline will operate the 787 to LGA is another story....
    The problem with socialism is that you eventually,
    run out of other people’s money.
    ” - Margaret Thatcher

  4. #4
    Moderator Matt Molnar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    9,302
    Any aircraft can land at LGA. Taking off is where things get sticky. :)
    Ladies and gentlemen, this is your captain speaking. We have a small problem.
    All four engines have stopped. We are doing our damnedest to get them under control.
    I trust you are not in too much distress. —Captain Eric Moody, British Airways Flight 9

  5. #5
    Senior Member RDU-JFK's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles, CA
    Posts
    1,185
    If takeoff would be tricky, how did American and United manage flying DC-10s into LGA, and Eastern A300s, and TWA L-1011s back in the day?
    "I can't wait until tomorrow, cause I get better looking everyday"
    --Joe Namath

  6. #6
    Moderator Matt Molnar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    9,302
    The DC10 and L1011 were designed specifically for LGA use.
    Ladies and gentlemen, this is your captain speaking. We have a small problem.
    All four engines have stopped. We are doing our damnedest to get them under control.
    I trust you are not in too much distress. —Captain Eric Moody, British Airways Flight 9

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    The weather sucks in Seattle
    Posts
    4,899
    Don't they still have 767's that fly out of LGA?
    The problem with socialism is that you eventually,
    run out of other people’s money.
    ” - Margaret Thatcher

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Rockaway Beach, NY
    Posts
    451
    Quote Originally Posted by RDU-JFK
    If takeoff would be tricky, how did American and United manage flying DC-10s into LGA, and Eastern A300s, and TWA L-1011s back in the day?
    I think what he was referring to was that any aircraft (B747, B777, A340, etc.) could land at LGA but the takeoff would be tricky.

    Mike

  9. #9
    Senior Member Ari707's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    West Hempstead, NY
    Posts
    1,153
    I remember flying on an Eastern L1011 going to Orlando and we had to take-off opposite of everyone else because the pier end of the runway wasn't strong enough to support the full weight.
    Overheard on JFK TOWER - S Turns are fine, U-Turns are bad....

  10. #10
    Senior Member K9DEP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    FRG-TWR
    Posts
    211
    Basically It all boils down to . . It can if it wants to.
    Jetblue Pilot departure announcement : "We are pleased to have some of the best flight attendants in the industry ...Unfortunately none of them are on this flight...!"

  11. #11
    Administrator PhilDernerJr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Queens, NY
    Posts
    12,470
    Quote Originally Posted by Midnight Mike
    Don't they still have 767's that fly out of LGA?
    Yes, Delta brings in several a day.

    On top of that, equipment subs are brought in occasionally by United, American and Air Canada.
    Email me anytime at [email protected].

  12. #12
    Administrator PhilDernerJr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Queens, NY
    Posts
    12,470
    Quote Originally Posted by RDU-JFK
    If takeoff would be tricky, how did American and United manage flying DC-10s into LGA, and Eastern A300s, and TWA L-1011s back in the day?
    As mentioned earlier, those planes were made for LGA. That is why they have the third engine...for extra power needed to takeoff on a 7,000 ft runway.

    I assume that the technology of the 787s engines will allow it the same ability to do so as the L-1011s and DC-10s.
    Email me anytime at [email protected].

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    The weather sucks in Seattle
    Posts
    4,899
    Phil

    That's what I thought, so, if the 767 lands at LGA, so can the 787. The other good thing about the 787 is that its noise profile is a lot smaller....
    The problem with socialism is that you eventually,
    run out of other people’s money.
    ” - Margaret Thatcher

  14. #14
    Senior Member Tom_Turner's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    2,193
    Haven't paid alot of attention to the 787 specs apart from knowing it is larger percentage composite/ lower costs etc.. but I believe there will be several versions. I imagine we'll see at least one of those at LGA.

    Don't forget, apart from the 767s, 727s, A300s, Tri-Stars and DC-10s, LGA also briefly hosted Convair 880s and Caravelles - though no photographic record on the net it seems.

    Tom
    "Keep 'em Flying"

  15. #15
    Senior Member Ari707's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    West Hempstead, NY
    Posts
    1,153
    glad I didn't live in Flushing when the 880's were there.....
    Overheard on JFK TOWER - S Turns are fine, U-Turns are bad....

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •