Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 23 of 23

Thread: Air France Crashes in Toronto

  1. #16
    Moderator Matt Molnar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    New York
    Posts
    9,302
    Side note:

    Despite the inferno, the fire hoses actually made the plane look cleaner than it did before the crash.

    Before: http://www.airliners.net/open.file/892360/L

    After: http://www.airliners.net/open.file/892370/L/

    :mrgreen:
    Ladies and gentlemen, this is your captain speaking. We have a small problem.
    All four engines have stopped. We are doing our damnedest to get them under control.
    I trust you are not in too much distress. —Captain Eric Moody, British Airways Flight 9

  2. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    1,139
    Quote Originally Posted by GothamSpotter
    Side note:

    Despite the inferno, the fire hoses actually made the plane look cleaner than it did before the crash.

    Before: http://www.airliners.net/open.file/892360/L

    After: http://www.airliners.net/open.file/892370/L/

    :mrgreen:
    That's hilarious! :)

  3. #18
    Senior Member K9DEP's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    FRG-TWR
    Posts
    211
    liveatc.net has an archived audio feed of Toronto approach and tower communications on its homepage

    also KLM691 which was supposed to land in toronto but could not b/c it was closed because an 'aircraft skidded off the runway' declared an emergency landing in Syracuse b/c of low fuel it landed safely though. And it too can be heard on the same Toronto ATC audio feed
    Jetblue Pilot departure announcement : "We are pleased to have some of the best flight attendants in the industry ...Unfortunately none of them are on this flight...!"

  4. #19
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    29
    The irony of this crash is that the landing occurred on the only one of 10 directional runways at YYZ that ends in a sharp embankment down to a river bed. Any other directional landing would likely have resulted in an over extended rollout onto an active highway which most likely would have resulted in deaths with the 343 still being written off. That no one died is a sheer miracle.

    An AC DC9-30 crashed into the same river bed after an aborted take-off in 1978. The fuselage broke in a similar fashion. Two pax died immediately and one soon after. Many more that survived had chronic bakc problems from the resulting freefall of the fuselage onto the river bed. There were calls then for the river bed to be filled in. Hopefully, now it will happen.

    Anyway, after the 343 crash, AF flew one more rotation the next day with a 343, and then upgraded to the 773ER for subsequent days. I expect the 343 will return to CDG-YYZ shortly.

    Cheers
    Neil
    YYZ/YTZ
    Toronto guy interested in the NYC av scene.

  5. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Scottsdale, AZ
    Posts
    1,139
    Quote Originally Posted by Yyz717
    Many more that survived had chronic bakc problems from the resulting freefall of the fuselage onto the river bed.
    How big of a drop is it? From what I can see in the pictures, it looks to me as if there is a downward sloping hill at the end of the runway and that the AF jet simply rolled down the hill until it came to a stop. I can't really see the river bed in the pictures.

    Josh

  6. #21
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    29
    Quote Originally Posted by jakbar
    Quote Originally Posted by Yyz717
    Many more that survived had chronic bakc problems from the resulting freefall of the fuselage onto the river bed.
    How big of a drop is it? From what I can see in the pictures, it looks to me as if there is a downward sloping hill at the end of the runway and that the AF jet simply rolled down the hill until it came to a stop. I can't really see the river bed in the pictures.

    Josh
    Probably a 100+ ft drop over several levels with a 30-45 degree decline I would say. The DC-9 perhaps had more speed and careened right onto the river. The 343 was estimated to be travelling at >100mph when it left the grassy runover and probably bumped its way down the steep hill until it came to a stop with much of the rear fuselage and tail still visible from the runway/adjacent highway level.
    Toronto guy interested in the NYC av scene.

  7. #22
    Administrator PhilDernerJr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Queens, NY
    Posts
    12,470
    From the photos I saw, I was thinking that it was about 50 feet down or so, and then back up the hill and across a road and down again.

    I assume this was what the passengers described as the "roller coaster"?

    I think it's time more airports start installing arrestor beds. Toronto was lucky this time.
    Email me anytime at [email protected].

  8. #23
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    29
    The 343 came to rest about halfway down the river bed. It did not reach bottom.
    Toronto guy interested in the NYC av scene.

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •