Post Your Recent REJECTIONS!

[lijk604]

Mario, the flag on the tail. I got hit with the same type on the same paint scheme into JFK.

[mirrodie]

http://www.airliners.net/procphotos/rej ... 39U-bk.jpg


And another. I dunno., I'll back off, but I find that with Anet, I'm getting rejected for either sharp or soft. I can't win.

[NIKV69]

Mario the two shots you posted are oversharpened big time. Here is my shot from that day of the 727. I purposedly did a little less sharpening and figured the subject would make it easier to get in.

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/1167738/L/

On your Emery you have jaggies all over the place and the overall look is way overdone. Back off a bit. The light was perfect when we shot at Ikea so you shouldn't need much USM.

[Mateo]

This photo was pretty much DOA out of the camera, but I'm a big fan of the T-6, so I took a stab. It was donked for the contrast - anything more and the sky behind gets totally blown out. Oh, well.
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1531974

[nwafan20]

Ugh,

Categories wrong or missing
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1536858
Comment: cargo category needed

Over Processed / Bad postprocessing
Dirty Scan / CMOS Dust spots
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1536854
Comment: Halos (WHAT? Can someone help me here with what the screener ment?) Can someone also show me where the dust spot is because I could not find it, I just tried every trick in the book (it doesn't help that my screen is dirty though)

Dirty Scan / CMOS Dust spots
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1536857
Again, can anyone spot it?

[AirtrafficController]

The last two photos are great, I see no dustspots.

[NIKV69]

Can someone also show me where the dust spot is because I could not find

I think I see one above the Delta title 6 windows back or so. Looks big too. As for the overprocessing after I equalized it I see this big mess at the bottom left corner where it looks like you went ape with the spot healing brush. Use clone stamp to clean dust spots. Also clean your camera so you don't get them.

Also if you equalize it the halo is clear as day.

As for the Delta 757 you have a huge dust spot in the upper left corner right against the border.

[nwafan20]

Alright guys, I saw it now.

My button must have gotten stuck by accident (hence the "ape" usage of the spot brush)

Saw the halo too, what causes that/what can I do about it?

[moose135]

Here's a helicopter shot from Pocono

- Horizon unlevel (Soft also)
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1538048

I knew this would be a tough shot - there isn't really anything I can see to level it. The copter isn't level as it comes down to land, the race track in the background angles away from you, so the wall and building behind it aren't really straight as you view them, and the campers in the infield are at all sorts of angles. Any ideas, or does this stay in the personal collection?

[NIKV69]

Saw the halo too, what causes that/what can I do about it?

Halos appear when you use USM improperly. Check the radius you are using. If it's too much you will get the halo effect.

[Mateo]

The Netjets scheme isn't easily rescued. Even before sharpening, it was starting to get a case of the jaggies. I'll take another stab at this one.
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1543315

The lighting conditions were tough - I was hoping a good composition and the uniqueness of the Osprey would help, but I guess not. The levels on the haze grey body are about as high as they can go before the sky becomes a blinding white blob.
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1543386

Bad framing. It's 117 pixels from the top of the winglet to the edge, 130 pixels from the lowest point on the wing; 9 pixels on the left, 16 pixels on the right. I'm not whiny enough to appeal, but it's not worth the effort to re-edit, either.
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1543448

[stuart schechter]

For the AS plane I just think it's too high in the picture. Everywhere else looks fine.

[T-Bird76]

Mateo I think you can save all three of those, the bizjet just needs to be sharpened less, all biz jets will have jaggies in the cheatlines. When you sharpen it just watch the edges for jaggies to appear. The Osprey I think can be corrected using levels pretty easily and again just watch the sharpening. The AS is an easy fix but again all three can be redited and sent back up, not bad shots at all.

[Iberia A340-600]

I've accumulated these in the past couple of weeks:

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1544116
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1542185
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1542183
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1542180
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1542177
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1542171
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1541594
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1539282
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1539273
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1537940
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1536852
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1536850
(This one pissed me off because I got a reject a little while ago for putting Song)
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1536849
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1536846
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1534257
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1528234

[jakbar]

http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1534257

Gordon, I think your 707JT shot is great. I am a little surprised it was rejected solely for "clutter" when all that is present besides the plane are a couple of cones on the ground and the stairs at the front door. I have seen pictures on both a.net and jp.net with both cones and stairs present in the picture.

That being said, on my screen there appears to be a very slight blue cast in the picture. If you fix that, I'd try uploading to a.net.

Great job on that picture.

Josh