So she spends over 150,000 on clothes for her and her family, for campaign purposes.
(Mind you, I can't even begin to remember what color she wore during the debate, let alone the brand name of her clothes)
One of the stores names was Saks Fifth Ave, right?
And, surely in a desperate move to avoid media persecution, her campaign says the clothing will go to charity.
So let me get things straight....Over 150,000 bucks blown in a clothes spending spree, (from a hockey mom, no less. Sure thats normal everyday housewife spending :shock: ), only to have it go to charity.
Seems to me that savvy hockey mom could have gone to Macy's, saved a ton of money and also donated it to charity.
My point? It you can't reduce spending at home, my gosh, how can you claim to do the same for the country?
Bookmarks