I thought this was very very intresting and was wondering what others that might be intrested in astronomy might think about all of this.
http://articles.news.aol.com/news/_a/as ... e1&cid=842
I thought this was very very intresting and was wondering what others that might be intrested in astronomy might think about all of this.
http://articles.news.aol.com/news/_a/as ... e1&cid=842
Southwest Airlines-"Once it pop's it's time to stop" Southwest Airlines-"Our Shamu's are almost real" Southwest Airlines -"We blow our top real easy" Southwest Airlines- "You can't top us..... really"
Very strange, considering this article that Midnight Mike posted a week ago: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14364833/
They obviously can't make up their minds. I mean, I know it's all part of the original study, but it went the opposite way of what was predicted a week ago.
P.S. What's going to be weird is when our kids grow up and hear/read references to the 9 planets and get confused. That's a bit bizarre.
One of the articles I read about it (in yesterday's Times, I think) mentioned that some of the astronomers there felt that the plan had been sprung on them, having been developed by a small group without much input from the community at large, and that the conference was the first chance anyone else had to provide input about it, which is how it came to be that the final plan differed so much from the initial one.Originally Posted by Mellyrose
It could have been more bizarre, with the original plan. Not only would there have been 12 planets instead of the 9 we grew up with, but one object would have been replanet-fied. The asteroid Ceres was originally considered a planet after its discovery, but was later "demoted" to asteroid status, where it's been since.Originally Posted by Mellyrose
Phil Gengler - NYCA's "other Phil"
I am ok either day, there has been arguments for years whether Pluto should be classified as a Planet. One of the major reasons is that Pluto had an unusual orbit, so, a change was going to happen sooner or later.
Now we just need to fix the rhyme:
My (Mercury)
Very (Venus)
Educated (Earth)
Mother (Marrs
Just (Jupiter)
Served (Saturn)
Us (Uranus)
"N" (Neptune
I guess, the "N" for Neptune could be Napkins, Nori,
“The problem with socialism is that you eventually,
run out of other people’s money.” - Margaret Thatcher
Nuts???
Anyway, there go my hopes for retiring on Pluto.
And I, I took the path less traveled by
and that has made all the difference......yet...
I have a feeling a handle of people are going to be very interested in what I post in the near future.
http://www.jetphotos.net/showphotos.php?userid=187
Well the excuse that the small group of astronomers who came to this ruleing are saying was the cause is that Pluto has an irregular orbit that crosses through Neptunes path quite often but I think that this is kind of stupid personally. First they were talking about classifying the a moon of a planet I forget exactly which one but now they go and yank a planet. Well looks like alot of science teachers will be busting out the whiteout this year in middle school lol
Southwest Airlines-"Once it pop's it's time to stop" Southwest Airlines-"Our Shamu's are almost real" Southwest Airlines -"We blow our top real easy" Southwest Airlines- "You can't top us..... really"
Its simple really... they decided that Disney characters do not belong in space.
Bookmarks