Bill each of those are easy fixes in the editing process, I'd play with them again and reupload them.Quote:
Originally Posted by njgtr82
Printable View
Bill each of those are easy fixes in the editing process, I'd play with them again and reupload them.Quote:
Originally Posted by njgtr82
Put a little too much into this one
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1380556
Thanks Tommy, I think I got 2 of them, but what do I need to do to fix the Fedex? Thanks
Bill
Is this one fixable?
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1381020
Any advice on these ones?:
Too much or too little contrast: (Which one?):
http://web2.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1381595
bad quality (I just don't see where the quality is bad, can someone point it out?):
http://web2.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1381615
I am especially interested in hearing Tommy's opinion
I screened that pic and accepted it, I don't think there's that much noise at all, the exposure is well within acceptable limits IMO. Try to appeal it.Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkLawrence
Make it a touch brighter and add some more contrast. I think it will be fine. Are you using Photoshop?Quote:
Originally Posted by njgtr82
As for the first one, add a bit of contrast to it. The second won't be able to be saved, the nose is blurry, no way to fix that.Quote:
Originally Posted by nwafan20
Thanks for the advice Tommy - it's in the appeal queue.Quote:
Originally Posted by T-Bird76
Ok hope it gets in, I don't screen appeals though, only head screeners.Quote:
Originally Posted by MarkLawrence
Nope - rejection on the appeal too - admin comments - Sorry, not up to JP standards - I'll wait for the next opportunity to get Shamu..
All dark/underexposed
http://web2.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1382325
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1382326
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1382333
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1382334
Very sad about these two:
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1382328
http://www.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1382332
Can someone help me with this?
The first one was rejected for too much/too little contrast, Tommy told me to bump the contrast, I did. Now it was rejected for being undersharpened and too much/ too little contrast. Does it need even more or did I put too much in?
http://web2.jetphotos.net/viewreject_b.php?id=1390229
Matt email me the orginal and let me see what I can do with it. I think the screeners who screened it were bit to picky. I think the contrast is fine considering the light it was taken in.Quote:
Originally Posted by nwafan20
my email is [email protected]