PDA

View Full Version : AA Baggage System Down at JFK



moose135
2008-07-30, 10:49 AM
WCBS radio is reporting the baggage system at AA's JFK terminal is down. Passengers are being given the option of traveling without their checked luggage (which will follow when the system is restored) or switching to a later flight. Reportedly lines are long, bags are piling up, and AA wasn't making announcements, but rather waiting to tell people when they finally arrived at the check-in counter. Stay tuned...

Matt Molnar
2008-07-30, 10:56 AM
Not a good way to sell your checked bag fees now is it American?

kc2aqg
2008-07-30, 11:15 AM
Whoa, definitely curious as to how this will pan out especially with baggage fees. I wonder what causes a baggage system to completely fail like this...

T-Bird76
2008-07-30, 11:19 AM
How does this have anything to do with the baggage fee????? It doesn't the system is down which blows but has nothing to do with a baggage fee or if it will be waived.

Getting baggage at AA's JFK terminal is the one downside to the terminal. You can wait an hour easy during busy times for your bag. It’s the one thing AA really needs to improve.

kc2aqg
2008-07-30, 11:28 AM
So Tommy, why should a customer have to pay $15 to check a bag (or more for 2+) when it is a known fact that due to operational reasons (read: AA's fault) that the bag will not be traveling with the passenger and will not be arriving at the destination(s) until a much later time?

Keep in mind, the baggage fee may be intended to off-set the fuel expenses of the added weight of the bags, but it is not a "fuel surcharge" per say and is not documented as such. I would interpret this as passengers should NOT be required to pay the fee if AA has an operational glitch of this magnitude. Of course, the way things should work is rarely the way they actually work...

T-Bird76
2008-07-30, 12:00 PM
So Tommy, why should a customer have to pay $15 to check a bag (or more for 2+) when it is a known fact that due to operational reasons (read: AA's fault) that the bag will not be traveling with the passenger and will not be arriving at the destination(s) until a much later time?

Keep in mind, the baggage fee may be intended to off-set the fuel expenses of the added weight of the bags, but it is not a "fuel surcharge" per say and is not documented as such. I would interpret this as passengers should NOT be required to pay the fee if AA has an operational glitch of this magnitude. Of course, the way things should work is rarely the way they actually work...

Because they are making the choice to still check a bag. The bag is still being transported one way or another. Yes it would be good customer service to waive the fee but from a purely black and white viewpoint the bag is still being checked and that would mean the fee would stand.

The real issue is the delay in the bag. How many people have cloths they may need for lets say a wedding they are attending, a meeting, event...or w/e else. More then likely AA will throw some miles at the Elites to keep them quiet.

mirrodie
2008-07-30, 01:54 PM
Because they are making the choice to still check a bag.

Acutally no. In most cases, the choice in made by the airline, GA, those who monitor what you can/ cannot bring onboard.


I think AA should waive their fees. Its called goodwill. They have nothing else really going for them.


But.... look at this...



http://gothamist.com/attachments/nyc_arts_john/073008luggage.jpg


You know that AA's money counters are looking at all the luggage and fees like a dog drolling over a bone.

Of course, now that AA will have to blow money $$ and time to deliver those bags to hotels and homes, you can kiss that revenue goodbye.

T-Bird76
2008-07-30, 02:25 PM
http://www.nycaviation.com/hosting/AA_fail.jpg

mirrodie
2008-07-30, 02:38 PM
you forgot an a


fAAil

Matt Molnar
2008-07-30, 02:58 PM
http://www.nycaviation.com/hosting/faail-0708.jpg

mirrodie
2008-07-30, 03:36 PM
I take full credit for that. And I see it was also posted on Anet?

Matt Molnar
2008-07-30, 03:41 PM
I take full credit for that. And I see it was also posted on Anet?
Yep. And it links back to this thread. :)

moose135
2008-07-30, 05:03 PM
Just heard on NBC news that AA is waiving baggage fees today due to these problems.

Matt Molnar
2008-07-30, 05:29 PM
Gothamist is now using it for their story!
http://gothamist.com/2008/07/30/america ... _issue.php (http://gothamist.com/2008/07/30/american_airlines_baggage_has_issue.php)

I gave you props in the Flickr caption, Mario.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/61477630@N00/2716932097/

mirrodie
2008-07-30, 08:42 PM
Thanks Matt. I'll take a measly 45% of any proceeds ;)

Lezam
2008-07-30, 08:57 PM
Wow, so anyone can just walk up and take one... see any good ones out there? :borat:

T-Bird76
2008-07-31, 09:43 AM
AA cancelled a good number of flights from JFK today as they are still having problems with their systems. This $hit better be fixed by Sunday when I leave :evil:

Alex T
2008-07-31, 11:18 AM
Hope this doesn't affect any other stations as I have to fly AA out of SEA Saturday the 2nd, day before Tommy makes his AA adventure.

I'll be ok, I'll be cool!

Alex

Matt Molnar
2008-07-31, 11:52 AM
I wonder if they're going to call FedEx to rescue them the way BA did after the T5 disaster.

Actually they should do it through FedEx.com and save 10%!

Smartass Flyboy
2008-07-31, 01:26 PM
Actually they should do it through FedEx.com and save 10%!

10%? bah, interline rate, ID75 :lol:

I took a 3 day this week, damn I pick good days to be off. :borat:

It'll be all cleaned up by tomorrow right? :?