PDA

View Full Version : Debunking 9/11 Myths



Midnight Mike
2006-08-07, 08:27 PM
Here is an interesting book:


Debunking 9/11 Myths: Why Conspiracy Theories Can't Stand Up to the Facts (Paperback)

Book is written by a writer from Popular Mechanics.....

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/158816 ... 32?ie=UTF8 (http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/158816635X/sr=8-1/qid=1154996633/ref=sr_1_1/103-9391858-8979032?ie=UTF8)


Book Description
A Groundbreaking, meticulous, and scientific analysis of the 9/11 conspiracy theories


The first conspiracy theories about September 11 began to emerge while the wreckage was still smoldering. Today, nearly five years later, hundreds of books and thousands of Web pages are devoted to the idea that the U.S. government encouraged, permitted, or actually carried out the attacks. These theories claim to be based on hard evidence. But an in-depth investigation by POPULAR MECHANICS—first published in the magazine’s March 2005 issue, and now greatly expanded into book form—definitively proves that the evidence most often cited by conspiracy theorists is inaccurate, misinterpreted, or false.

The original article in POPULAR MECHANICS caused a huge groundswell of interest, setting off online debates that continue to this day. Debunking 9/11 Myths expands that investigation to include the 20 most prominent and persistent claims underlying the conspiracy theories, focusing on concrete, physical facts rather than political hypothesizing. Among the issues examined: claims that air traffic control violated standard operating procedures by not immediately intercepting the stricken jets; that the fire caused by the crashes wasn’t actually hot enough to melt steel and cause structural damage in the World Trade Center; that the holes in the Pentagon were too small to have been made by a Boeing 757; and that Flight 93 was actually shot down by an Air Force plane.

The fascinating and in-depth findings come from leading experts in all the relevant fields, including aviation, air defense, air traffic control, civil engineering, firefighting, metallurgy, and geology.

Tom_Turner
2006-08-07, 09:03 PM
For what it's worth, here are the comments immediately following in the discussion section from the link...

<<
What desperation looks like
Latest post 12 hours ago
Defenders of the official conspiracy theory are on the defense. This is a sign that the truth movement is having a tremendous... (More)
I agree, this book is 100% pure BS and Neofascist spin. Funny thing is when you look at all the BS like this put out there, all the... (More)
See all 4 posts in this discussion (3 participants)

We know this book is a lie! BYU Physics Dept. find Controlled Demolition of WTCs, "thermate" traces!
Latest post 12 hours ago
We know this book is a lie! BYU Physics Dept. find Controlled Demolition of WTCs, "thermate" traces! On August 1st, on C-SPAN,... (More)
Talk about disinformation. All of this conspiracy nonsense has been discredited. Professor Jones is a lone wolf crying out... (More)
See all 2 posts in this discussion (2 participants)

Riddle: How is this book like the official story?
Latest post 12 hours ago
No one buys it! HAHAHAHAHA... Thanks, Senator McCain. For selling out your country. (More)
Ha ha ha..yet most Americans don't "buy" wild conspiracy theories. Laugh it up, fuzz ball...LOL. (More)
See all 2 posts in this discussion (2 participants) >>

PhilDernerJr
2006-08-07, 09:33 PM
Honestly, this topic already exists, but since this is more direct to the debunking, I like it.

I found this link the other day and thoguht that it, too, was a good anti-conspiracy site.

http://www.ccdominoes.com/lc/LooseChangeGuide.html

PhilDernerJr
2006-08-08, 07:52 AM
A lot of the conspiracy comes fromt he accusations made in the "Loose Change" video, most of whichis BS. A regular theorist that doesn't know what he's talking about, referencing people that are not even experts as if they are, and jsut saying things that other theorists want to hear.

None of it holds any ground. It's full of assumptions that they cast as fact. The actual facts are disregarded by them because they use the excuse that we can't believe the REAL experts and the real investigators.

Tom_Turner
2006-08-08, 02:44 PM
You're right about all that below Phil...

Probably half the country or so now doubts the "official" version of "911", with many going a good deal further than that it seems. Don't even start on what the rest of the world's population believes....(i.e.: the middle-east...)

What doesn't make sense is why "everyone" (nearly) thinks its such a good idea to have these "Get out the Vote" "Rock the Vote" whatever campaigns every few years.. as if getting massive numbers of ignorant or ill informed people to vote on issues they don't understand is going to help the country.

Then again, the casual nature of lies only encourages people's skepticism... the air is "safe" on 9/12 , BC "did not have sex with that woman"....etc.. Didn't Kerry's wife insinuate Dubya had Osama hidden away someplace to spring out on the public on election eve??

guess everyones got their favorite conspiracies...



A lot of the conspiracy comes fromt he accusations made in the "Loose Change" video, most of whichis BS. A regular theorist that doesn't know what he's talking about, referencing people that are not even experts as if they are, and jsut saying things that other theorists want to hear.

None of it holds any ground. It's full of assumptions that they cast as fact. The actual facts are disregarded by them because they use the excuse that we can't believe the REAL experts and the real investigators.