Climactic Photographic Moment For Me

[PhilDernerJr]

I did somethign yesterday that was very exciting for me.

Some of you might have seen this shot of mine on Anet.

http://www.airliners.net/open.file/680988/L/

http://nycaviation.com/pichost/680988.jpg

Well, yesterday I was out in Manhattan taking phots and wanted to get some skyline and city shots that I've been dying to get.

I've always loved that ATA skyline shot, and luck was on my side when I was able to take that same exact photo....but from the other side:

http://nycaviation.com/pichost/ATA_LGA_22_ESB_1024.jpg

Note the park behind the plane, the same spot that I took the original photo.

I took this from the top of the Empire State Building. I was up there and decided to do a little spotting from 1,400 up and 8 miles away. I zoomed in and there came an ATA 738 on rwy 22.

Just something really cool that I was excited to do.

[eric8669]

great shot Phil,

The vantage point from the Empire State Building is unusual, you can get some interesting shots from up there. Back in 03, I was able to get concorde taxing down 31R.

Eric

[mikephotos]

Nice shot Phil! Now you just need that 1000mm/f5.6 and you're set!

Mike

[SengaB]

Nice shot Phil!,
Nice to see all kinds of ideas out there for the hobby.
Senga

[FlyingColors]

Thank you for taking the time to upload your photos to Photos.Net!

As always, we sincerely appreciate your continued support, and look
forward
to seeing more photo contributions from you in the future!

If you have any questions, comments, or concerns regarding the results
of
your photo submissions, which are outlined below, please respond
directly
to this e-mail, and the screener who handled your photos will get in
touch
with you shortly.

Please be sure to check out our Photo Upload Guidelines page, for
detailed
photo submission guidelines, as well as detailed explanations of every
rejection
reason.
You may occasionally receive a message that a photo has been 'passed
onto the
administrator for review by the screener.' In a case where a screener
does not
feel comfortable making a decision on a photos' acceptance into the
database,
the photo is added to a special queue for review by one of the site
administrators.
You should expect a final decision on the photo in an additional 12 to
24 hours.

If you would like to appeal a rejection, please click the 'Appeal
Rejection' link
located below the information for the photo you wish to appeal.

Special Announcement:
proud to introduce our new 'Digital Photo Processing
Forum,' located
at http://www/forums/viewforum.php?f=12. If you have
received a rejection
you just don't know how to fix, or understand, please don't hesitate to
make use of this
forum, moderated by a group of our screeners, for suggestions,
assistance, and even
demonstrations on how to bring out the best in your photos!

Best Regards,

The Photos.Net Screening Team

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Photo Submission Results:

Photo ID xyz was rejected from the database.
Airline: ATA
Aircraft: Boeing 737
Registration: Ntoofar

Reason(s) for Rejection:

- Poor Lighting (Too Dark)
- too far
- too small
- too personal
- too much feeling


********************just kidding!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Hey, I do like it, well done!

Mike :wink:

[Matt Molnar]

That's frikkin cool, Phil.

[Vodkagirlkris]

Good job baby! I know how much you love those.

[Tom_Turner]

Phil -- I worked in the city corp building very briefly and there was a nice view of LGA from there as well. Thanks for sharing the shot here.. Very enjoyable..

Mie (Flying Colors) : you forgot its Bad Common as well. Next time he will need to get a different registration. (Remember: Bad Common rejections will make you a "better Pho-Tog")

Bad Remarks too...Serious aviation researchers from Junior High Schools may stop frequenting our site if they're distracted by irrelevant photographer comments.

Also- In the future please move just a bit to the left of the Chyrsler Building . Ideally no one should be able to tell at which airport an aircraft was shot. Please refer to "Tip of the Day #1" - available to all Premium Members. With Greater practice you may include control towers in your shots... begin at General Aviation Airports.)

Tip of the Day #2: Do Not use Neat Image - it causes your images to loose detail and introduces an unnatural smoothness. Please feel free however to sharpen your aircraft into a thousand little shards of glass...we like it this way.

Please Note: With this rejection you are now down to 59 upload slots from your previous 60. We accept only the "very best" (59 shots you can take in one week). New Feature: If you've been able to buy 3 six packs of Budweiser in the last 12 months from selling your aviation Art to enthusiast magazines, Flight Sim web sites, Power Point presentations, And Travel Agent brouchures, you should quit your day job and opt for a large logo through your images. - Just don't provide your own.

This will protect you from being ripped off. - except when large consortiums of avition photogreaphers undercut you to "grow" thier market. :)

[N790SW]

i got the same shot from the empire state builing - nd i was able to see a song 752 landing if u want the pic - e-mail me

[mirrodie]

Philly, you've come full circle! Thats great!

[Speedbird1]

Great view of an inbound to LGA from the ESB. I thought I was the only one to do spotting from observatories. Phil, did you notice the Concorde sitting on her barge on the NW corner of the observatory? I fondly recall doing lots of spotting from the WTC of the action at JFK. I once followed JAL Flight 6 depart 31L at JFK and head out over the Atlantic. Lots of airships passed under the Trade Center Observatory, too. I mostly take videos and the microwave interference plays havoc with my camcorder. Do you have any problems using a digital still camera? Did you ever photograph from the Trade Center?