Aviation News

June 29, 2011

Two Killed in Upstate New York Plane Crash

More articles by »
By: BNO News
Tags: , , ,
A small plane crash in upstate New York’s Hudson Valley killed the two people on board, officials said Tuesday.

Dutchess County Airport crash map

The incident occurred on Tuesday at around 12 p.m. local time, when the pilot of the four-seat, single-engine Cessna 172 Skyhawk (N61579) was approaching the Dutchess County Airport runway in Wappinger, New York. The pilot lost control and crashed down in a field around 65 miles north of New York City, Sherriff’s Seargent Jonathan Hughes told the Albany Times Union.

The pilot was reportedly practicing touch-and-go landings – which is when the aircraft lands and takes off repeatedly without stopping – said Arlene Salac, spokeswoman for the Federal Aviation Administration.

Salac said the pilot and a second individual in the aircraft died during the crash. The fatal victims have not been identified, but the Dutchess County Sheriff’s office said both were males, one from Dutchess County and one from Putnam County.

The aircraft is registered to Millbrook Flight LLC of the nearby Poughquag area in Beekman, New York. Investigations are ongoing as the cause of the accident remains unclear.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Robert-S/502706532 Robert S

    Do you know about Cessna and SAIB CE-10-40R1?

    SAIB Number: CE-10-40R1 Issue Date: 07/30/2010

    Special Airworthiness Information Bulletin is to inform pilots, owners,
    operators and maintenance and service personnel of Cessna Aircraft
    Company Model 100, 200 or 300 series , any model and/or suffix in the
    series of airplanes as applicable OF THE HAZARDS ASSOCIATED WITH WATER

    Could this SAIB have anything
    to do with the indicated design flaw of undetectable water in the fuel
    tanks of Cessna fuel tanks? Have you tested your Cessna fuel tank for
    positive detection of fuel contamination? I have tested the Cessna 172P,
    Cessna 172RG, Cessna 150 and Cessna 152. All failed my test for
    positive detection of fuel contamination during the pre-flight.

    CE-10-40R1 is all about prevention of water in Cessna fuel tanks but
    nothing about positive detection of water in the fuel tank once
    prevention has failed. What if your fuel tanks were sabotaged the night
    before your preflight the next morning. I would rather positively detect
    and eliminate any hazardous quantity of water that the saboteur
    introduced before takeoff. When prevention fails for any reason positive
    detection and elimination of any hazardous quantity of water any where
    in the fuel tank as the aircraft sits in its normal ground attitude must
    prevail. Fact is positive detection and elimination DO NOT WORK!